Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance


trucpfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Imagine a Gettleman and Tepper combo. They would swell a room with their egos.

 I can imagine drinks and pink slips being thrown. 
 

Worth noting though, Gettleman was gone when they gave Jones that contract. Pretty sure. 

Edited by strato
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, strato said:

 I can imagine drinks and pink slips being thrown. 
 

Worth noting though, Gettleman was gone when they gave Jones that contract. Pretty sure. 

He was.

Also that entire 2019 QB class was just weak in general, minus Kyler.

Ironically enough, Gettleman may have actually drafted the second best QB in that draft (it's a toss up between Jones and Minshew). Haskins was the only other 1st round QB and that was a whole mess in and of itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a backup to replace Dalton on a 2 year deal for the right low figure price, sure. Worst case scenario, he is a low price backup that doesn't really offer a whole lot. Best case scenario, he actually competes for the starting job with Bryce while we look for the replacement for both. Either way, doesn't really move the needle much, but everything depends on the numbers. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

As a backup to replace Dalton on a 2 year deal for the right low figure price, sure. Worst case scenario, he is a low price backup that doesn't really offer a whole lot. Best case scenario, he actually competes for the starting job with Bryce while we look for the replacement for both. Either way, doesn't really move the needle much, but everything depends on the numbers. 

Uh....no. He is too close to starting in that situation. That's bad for us and him.

I will take Dalton 100 out of 100 times over Jones.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HPPantherzfan said:

Because they literally had him playing safety on the practice squad.  He knew his QB days were done at that point 

This is a move that will haunt a coaching staff for good. Whenever Daboll is sacked, this will follow him to his next job...he will likely never have a team with a halfway-decent QB again.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Greatman77 said:

We don't need (another) failed QB from a bad team. Just, no.

This is a luxury for a team with a settled QB situation. Go back up Mahomes or some other solid starter. That is the way to potentially turn around your career. It's not going to a dumpster fire franchise(which we are) in which you are a hair's breadth from starting and being in an even worse situation to succeed. 

Bad for us, worse for him. Makes zero sense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Uh....no. He is too close to starting in that situation. That's bad for us and him.

I will take Dalton 100 out of 100 times over Jones.

Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can. 

The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can. 

The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 

One is a tried and true veteran of moderate playing ability.  The other is a wild QB bust with shattered confidence and questionable playing ability. 

I would prefer not to be shuffling two shitty QB's in and out all next season. Maybe try extending a mediocre veteran and hope for potentially mediocre results? As opposed to shooting for bottom quarter of the NFL and ending up with bottom tenth of all QB's on NFL rosters.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All these rankings have more to do with the writers love or hate for a team.  Morgan, IMO, has done a really good job at building this team.  Yeah, there are a couple of whiffs but for the most part he has done quite well drafting and signing free agents.  22 is a bit low but it's a stupid opinion based on how little a writer knows about the Panthers. 
    • When I saw that I was thinking the same thing.  If Evero does have a great season and gets hired as a head coach I wouldn't mind see McD as our DC.  If we do poorly as a team, I definitely would want him to be the front runner for HC.
    • But it's not about not upsetting a player under contract, it's about not causing a rift in the locker room. The players love Bryce, whether as a person or a player doesn't matter.  You can't spend a Top 10 pick on a QB and then still start your #1 overall pick in the last year of their contract. That act alone will cause a massive locker room rift/distraction that would be unavoidable.  Some players will question why you "wasted" a Top 10 pick on a QB you're not going to start instead of someone who can help right away.  While others will question why we are keeping Bryce around for the season when it's clear he's not the future guy at that point. It would just make for a bad start to the rookie's career while causing locker room distractions.  Again, I'd bet this has never happened in this league before with any 1st round QB, let alone the #1 overall pick, and there is a reason for it, which is that it would be epically stupid to do. And I used the Vikings as the example as they're the closest I can think of, because again, there isn't a direct comparison as nobody has ever done it because it's that dumb of an idea (no offense lol).
×
×
  • Create New...