Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Obligatory Carolina vs Kansas city BBQ thread..


Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

I mean, I've had mustard based that is very good. It isn't my first choice.

I was raised up in SE Va and a lot of the stuff there was like Eastern NC. With the thin vinegar stuff. Some good memories of a couple of spots in the '60s that were in places that it may as well have been the '40s or even the '20s the way they did it with the pits and all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

You've never heard people argue which is the better heating option?

Propane is a great heating option for your home but BBQ is wood fire.  Period. Preferably cooked on something that makes you rack your brain thinking about when your last tetanus booster was.

Propane, pellets bullshit, charcoal... GTFO

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Propane is a great heating option for your home but BBQ is wood fire.  Period. Preferably cooked on something that makes you rack your brain thinking about when your last tetanus booster was.

Propane, pellets bullshit, charcoal... GTFO

I agree. But I have seen people claim propane is just as good as wood. I think they're heretics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, strato said:

You kidding right? Slow roasted pig all the way. I like the thin vinegar/hot pepper sauce the best but mustard, tomato based, I don't care it is all good.

Licking Jackie Chan GIF

All day. Every day.

18 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Nah sweet n sour with a mayo avocado peppercorn dipping sauce.

Ew Sickening GIF by Gerbert!

Take that garbage out of here

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly He's played two seasons and started 28 games. He's well beyond the point of being able to point to 2 or 3 games and being able to say, "THAT is the QB he is and will be in the future" Of course he can get there, but anyone trying to use just those couple of games to rank his place amongst the games QB's today and their full career's worth of playing at that level, is just asinine. Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow, Hurts, Herbert, Daniels, Stafford, Goff, Geno, Purdy, Baker, Love, Dak, Tua, Kyler, Lawrence That's 17 QB's right there that have played better over their careers than Bryce has played at his best.  And I'm not saying they're all studs or guys I'd want to be our QB moving forward, Tua for example I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but his body of work is a million times better than Bryce's has been. It's also not including any of the other QB's drafted in 2023/2024 other than Daniels. So again, say you believe in Bryce, say you think he's going to prove he can and should be our QB of the future, that's all fair and totally fine. But nobody can say he's been an above average QB in his career thus far, it's just an asinine notion.
    • I'd think we could get one of those from Dallas for... whatever. 
×
×
  • Create New...