Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mid week discussion: via Trevor Lawrence hit.


Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You know how I know you're wrong? It's been a decade and it still gets talked about on here often.

Im talking about the refs not calling anything in the game. That game is when I knew the NFL was rigged.

 

It's why I no longer take the NFL seriously. It's more entertainment these days. Go watch the Chiefs and the Swifties take over the sport.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Texans argument about the “fake slide” is a valid argument (for the league) but this was a defender launching for the head. This wasn’t an accidental “couldn’t let up” in time hit and he has a history.

You the know the difference between being intentional and accidental contact when you see it.

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a world exist where Trevor gets hit on that play and it not be a dirty hit.  That hit was dirty.   There was intent.  The forearm into the  neck head was a choice given the position Trevor was in.  You could have pulled off to some degree and maybe just end up hitting him somewhere.  Flag and no suspension.  
 

repeat offender.  It’s coached.  Texans coach was a clown. Blaming everyone from Trevor to blaming Jags players sticking up for thier QB after his body locked up stiff after the clear dirty hit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

The Texans argument about the “fake slide” is a valid argument (for the league) but this was a defender launching for the head. This wasn’t an accidental “couldn’t let up” in time hit and he has a history.

You the know the difference between being intentional and accidental contact when you see it.

It's not even as much as the "fake slide" argument as much as just the "late slide" argument in general, particularly with how fast these players move out there.

When you're running full speed and know you're about to take 1 or 2 more steps before you initiate your tackle attempt, it's real hard to pull out of it when the QB slides at the last second.

The game camera angle makes this hit look so egregious, but when you see the end zone angle from behind the defense, I'm much more sympathetic to it as you really see that he was really about to start his tackle when Lawrence decided to slide.  

This one I probably lean towards siding with the league because the defender was a repeat offender, but if I just saw that angle of the hit without that information, I'm not so sure I'd think a suspension was warranted, at least not a 3 game one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

It's not even as much as the "fake slide" argument as much as just the "late slide" argument in general, particularly with how fast these players move out there.

When you're running full speed and know you're about to take 1 or 2 more steps before you initiate your tackle attempt, it's real hard to pull out of it when the QB slides at the last second.

The game camera angle makes this hit look so egregious, but when you see the end zone angle from behind the defense, I'm much more sympathetic to it as you really see that he was really about to start his tackle when Lawrence decided to slide.  

This one I probably lean towards siding with the league because the defender was a repeat offender, but if I just saw that angle of the hit without that information, I'm not so sure I'd think a suspension was warranted, at least not a 3 game one.

You can see with this angle, he’s starting to lower his shoulder just as Lawrence initiated his slide, it’s real hard to not follow through with that hit with the speed these guys move at and not watching the play in slow motion

So again, given his previous late hits, a suspension is probably warranted here, but if that wasn't the case, just getting tossed from the game probably would have been sufficient on this one.

https://x.com/commishjared/status/1863303341201133601?s=46&t=LQU3yEizU6WVOcNoJTNyOw

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

It's not even as much as the "fake slide" argument as much as just the "late slide" argument in general, particularly with how fast these players move out there.

When you're running full speed and know you're about to take 1 or 2 more steps before you initiate your tackle attempt, it's real hard to pull out of it when the QB slides at the last second.

The game camera angle makes this hit look so egregious, but when you see the end zone angle from behind the defense, I'm much more sympathetic to it as you really see that he was really about to start his tackle when Lawrence decided to slide.  

This one I probably lean towards siding with the league because the defender was a repeat offender, but if I just saw that angle of the hit without that information, I'm not so sure I'd think a suspension was warranted, at least not a 3 game one.

The Houston player dived into Lawrence with his forearm into Lawrence's head and neck.  That is where the fine/suspension came in.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Didn’t this same thing happen to cam in 2018 against Atlanta? I can’t remember, did that player get suspended? 

Damonte Kazee. Ejected and fined $10,000. No suspension. He wasn’t a repeat offender at that time though. He’s had other hits in his career that he has been suspended for. (A hit last year on Pittman from the colts netted him a three game suspension)

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Lobo said:

Didn’t this same thing happen to cam in 2018 against Atlanta? I can’t remember, did that player get suspended? 

I've seen that hitting the social media rounds.  I don't think the hits are the same and that because of what happens in the final second.  Atlanta defender at the very end rolled to the side.  Which while late and probably never should of happened, eased off at the last second.  Texan defender chose to destroy at the final second. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2024 at 5:35 PM, Davidson Deac II said:

The Houston player dived into Lawrence with his forearm into Lawrence's head and neck.  That is where the fine/suspension came in.  

If his arm had been out like he was trying to wrap up, I don't think it would have been a penalty because it was such a bang bang play and both players started moving down at almost the same time. Having that arm in like that changed the entire nature of the "tackle". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...