Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce May Not Be the Answer


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Okay well what else are you going to do with the money? You think it's asinine to build around your young #1 overall draft pick? I don't really understand what you're trying to say. If we surround Bryce with weapons and he fails wouldn't the team be set up for us to insert X Qb into X scenario? Why would we want a new QB to come in with 0 resources surrounding them. Your post just doesnt make sense to me.

Exactly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think Canales tailored his play calling around Bryce's strengths when he came back into the lineup and now we're seeing defenses adapt to that now that there's some film of it available. We'll see what he looks like over the final games.

It's not rocket science.

Take away the run, flood the zones within 15 yards of the line of scrimmage and ask him to make NFL level throws beyond that.

He can't. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jfra78 said:

I'm pretty sure Bryce isnt the answer, I've seen improvement but it still isn't much more than backup quality.  This isn't the draft to go get your guy, sign a vet let them have a true competition and fill in the holes on the roster through the draft.

^This.  And with a better roster and a 2nd year coaching staff he can't take a huge leap forward, we all will have our answer about Bryce. No more glimpses of improvement or small moral victories.  He's either going to be our Jackson, Mahomes or Allen or we need to start the search elsewhere in '26.  The Giants thought it was going to finally click with Jones too, but it didn't and most outsiders saw it too.  We had better not end up like the Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

It's not rocket science.

Take away the run, flood the zones within 15 yards of the line of scrimmage and ask him to make NFL level throws beyond that.

He can't. 

Pretty much. Canales was doing a really good job adapting but there's only so much you can do schematically and with situational play calling when your QB is very limited and your overall offensive skill position talent is mediocre. If we can't run the ball down our opponents' throats with Chuba behind our OL we're cooked.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, NAS said:

Unless you have Andrew Luck or Cam Newton talent level in the draft, you take BPA and build the roster. Maybe sign another free agent to compete or draft a QB next year if he doesn’t improve but I believe he has shown that he is more than capable of being a starting QB and give you a chance to win. How quickly we forget what he did last few weeks

The worst thing you can do as a franchise is give up on him before his light comes on-people act like supporting bryce means "Bryce or bust" but it does not--he is an asset, and you keep bringing in people to compete.  I do not understand why people struggle with this concept.  We want to to succeed, but we should not put all eggs in one basket.  However, some folks are concrete, convergent thinkers--it must be black or white, on or off, all or nothing. 

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, NAS said:

Unless you have Andrew Luck or Cam Newton talent level in the draft, you take BPA and build the roster. Maybe sign another free agent to compete or draft a QB next year if he doesn’t improve but I believe he has shown that he is more than capable of being a starting QB and give you a chance to win. How quickly we forget what he did last few weeks

I just don't agree with this. If there's a QB that Dave "QB Whisperer" Canales thinks is better than Bryce, you absolutely take him.

I don't forget what Bryce did the last few weeks. Nor do I forget what he did for his first season and however many games. And ultimately this is his second season and we're having to hang out hats on 3-5 decent to good games.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

The worst thing you can do as a franchise is give up on him before his light comes on-people act like supporting bryce means "Bryce or bust" but it does not--he is an asset, and you keep bringing in people to compete.  I do not understand why people struggle with this concept.  We want to to succeed, but we should not put all eggs in one basket.  However, some folks are concrete, convergent thinkers--it must be black or white, on or off, all or nothing. 

 

If Cam Ward is on the board when we're up you gotta take him. That's all I'm saying.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Okay well what else are you going to do with the money? You think it's asinine to build around your young #1 overall draft pick? I don't really understand what you're trying to say. If we surround Bryce with weapons and he fails wouldn't the team be set up for us to insert X Qb into X scenario? Why would we want a new QB to come in with 0 resources surrounding them. Your post just doesnt make sense to me.

I didn't say don't improve the roster, just don't go full '21 Rams.  The reason? Mortgaging the future to prop up a QB that likely still doesn't have what it takes to go on a SB run is dumb.  Bryce and #1 overall draft pick is a punchline now, btw.  If he was able to live up the the billing of #1 overall draft pick, this would be a different conversation, but it's not. He's got one more year to change his trajectory to franchise QB from the track of backup he's on currently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

The worst thing you can do as a franchise is give up on him before his light comes on-people act like supporting bryce means "Bryce or bust" but it does not--he is an asset, and you keep bringing in people to compete.  I do not understand why people struggle with this concept.  We want to to succeed, but we should not put all eggs in one basket.  However, some folks are concrete, convergent thinkers--it must be black or white, on or off, all or nothing. 

 

QB is a position like any other. If an upgrade is available and it's the pick you think upgrades the team most... Go for it

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I just don't agree with this. If there's a QB that Dave "QB Whisperer" Canales thinks is better than Bryce, you absolutely take him.

I don't forget what Bryce did the last few weeks. Nor do I forget what he did for his first season and however many games. And ultimately this is his second season and we're having to hang out hats on 3-5 decent to good games.

Indeed. It's very simple. If the draft plays out where the Panthers are up next and one of the top QB's are available Dan Morgan and Dave Canales cannot afford to say no thanks. It does not matter how Bryce Young plays over the next 3 games or what he did over the last few. The broader body of work is there for anyone to see.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Beck is likely to be a Day 2 or 3 guy.
    • Schlereth calling us back to back....somebody call up Morgan!  Schlereth got that dawg in him!
    • I was just thinking — if Bryce had been the #1 overall pick without the massive trade-up, there wouldn’t be nearly this much anger and resentment toward him. The problem isn’t Bryce himself; it’s what Scott Fitterer gave up to get him and how the front office completely mismanaged the assets that followed. The picks from the Christian McCaffrey trade — one of our few major opportunities to rebuild with young talent — were essentially wasted. The second-rounder was used on Jonathan Mingo,  The third and fourth-round picks were packaged to move up for DJ Johnson, a 25-year-old rookie  who looked like a miss from day 1.  That’s brutal roster management. And when you add in other misses like Trevon Wallace and Xavier Legette—guys who were supposed to be athletic difference-makers but haven’t moved the needle—it just compounds the issue. Combine that with a string of awful free-agent signings (Hurst, Chark, Bozeman regressing, etc.), and it’s no wonder the offense looks like a mess. And this goes beyond Fitterer — it’s a scouting department problem too. For years, the Panthers’ evaluations have been inconsistent and reactive. They’ve chased traits and combine numbers over production and football IQ. The same front office that identified DJ Johnson as a third-round target somehow passed on multiple plug-and-play starters at positions of need. When your scouting process keeps missing on mid-round talent — the backbone of good teams — no quarterback can save you. The lack of depth and development across this roster is the real indictment. None of these failures are Bryce’s fault directly. But when the entire team looks lifeless, the narrative circles back to him. He was supposed to be the “force multiplier,” the “point guard” who elevates everyone else. Problem is, there’s not much “force” around him to multiply, and that style of quarterback play only works when the infrastructure is solid — coaching, protection, and playmakers. Look at the 49ers for comparison. If San Francisco didn’t have elite coaching, culture, and roster talent, that Trey Lance trade would be seen as one of the biggest front-office blunders ever. The difference is they had the organization to survive it. At least Bryce is serviceable — Lance isn’t even on their roster anymore. Put Bryce in the 49ers’ system and he’s probably putting up Brock Purdy-like numbers. The bottom line is this: the dysfunction in Carolina didn’t start with Bryce Young, and it sure hasn’t ended with him. This is a franchise problem — years of poor drafting, weak scouting, short-sighted trades, and constant turnover. The common denominator through all of it? David Tepper. Until the culture, patience, and football operations at the top change, it won’t matter who the quarterback is.  
×
×
  • Create New...