Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: grading WR by ability to separate, YAC and catching the ball


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://x.com/throwthedamball/status/1871591730874851329?s=46&t=JBd6ZXmGQ3LmWL-ineTnAA
 

obviously PFF so grain of salt etc 

Top right: lots of separation, good yac/hands. 

bottom left: can’t get open, drops everything/does nothing with the ball

just eyeballing it

Thielen: top 15 ish % overall. @NAS not to call you out, just something we were discussing the other day. Thielen is having a fantastic year by rate. 

Coker: slightly below avg separation, above avg hands/yac

XL: sucks

Diontae Johnson: only thing more difficult than covering him is medicating him

David Moore: not a bad piece, for what is ideally a number 4 receiver.

also Christ philly win a Super Bowl already. 

IMG_5619.jpeg

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Thielen has been excellent this year. Defenses know that he's Bryce's first read on any critical conversion and they still aren't usually able to stop it.

There’s a very easy explanation for this: veteran presence 

and by that I mean the presence of his arms pushing defenders away 

not to mention him just straight taking out other defenders on crossing routes  

i love it

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

There’s a very easy explanation for this: veteran presence 

and by that I mean the presence of his arms pushing defenders away 

not to mention him just straight taking out other defenders on crossing routes  

i love it

He's fun to watch - so is Coker, but for different reasons. 

I think some fans seriously underestimate how important Thielen is to this offense.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

https://x.com/throwthedamball/status/1871591730874851329?s=46&t=JBd6ZXmGQ3LmWL-ineTnAA
 

obviously PFF so grain of salt etc 

Top right: lots of separation, good yac/hands. 

bottom left: can’t get open, drops everything/does nothing with the ball

just eyeballing it

Thielen: top 15 ish % overall. @NAS not to call you out, just something we were discussing the other day. Thielen is having a fantastic year by rate. 

Coker: slightly below avg separation, above avg hands/yac

XL: sucks

Diontae Johnson: only thing more difficult than covering him is medicating him

David Moore: not a bad piece, for what is ideally a number 4 receiver.

also Christ philly win a Super Bowl already. 

IMG_5619.jpeg

There was definitely no missing XL on Sunday. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I think people are really underestimating how bad XL has been. 

I think the disappointment in him has been offset by the excitement in Coker. Offsetting a potential mistake with our first pick with a gem undrafted FA is a wash. 

imagine if they both develop into solid starters 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Play calling is also better than last year. Look at AT’s separation last year vs this year. DC is drawing up plays to get him open as he should be. Hopefully we finally found ourselves a solid HC. As for XL, I’m not too worried. He has flashed some potential which is what I expected from him year 1. He was never going to be a plug and play WR. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man we are really playing with fire. AT will be what? 33 next year? He’s great this year no doubt but you hit a wall in the NFL with age and when it comes it hits HARD. XL I’m not writing off but he hasn’t been good this year. Coker, great find by us but he’s a nice complementary piece. 
 

we need to look long and hard at trading for garret Wilson or going WR first round 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...