Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A look back at preseason predictions


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

I called 6 wins likely, with a ceiling of 8.  I figured Young would improve simply because he couldn't have gotten any worse.  I thought the defense would be about the same, but they regressed big time. 

All in all, a slight disappointment from my preseason prediction, but I wasn't expecting anything special either.  I don't see a huge step forward next year, though.  Depending on the offseason, I may keep my win total at 6 for 2025.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I was/am still disgruntled about how bad the 2024 draft was. 

I was a Bryce guy pre-draft but I had admittedly lost all faith in him after last year. He doesn't have me completely back but I like what I see. It just has to keep getting better and I will be back.

Yeah same here on the draft. We had complete tunnel vision on XL regardless of who else was available.

Still miffed we didn’t get one of the guys that were more obviously going to transition easily. 

DeJean, Ladd, Sainristil, Frazier…there was legit talent right there and we reached on a guy we oversold ourselves on with marginal college experience.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I called 6 wins likely, with a ceiling of 8.  I figured Young would improve simply because he couldn't have gotten any worse.  I thought the defense would be about the same, but they regressed big time. 

All in all, a slight disappointment from my preseason prediction, but I wasn't expecting anything special either.  I don't see a huge step forward next year, though.  Depending on the offseason, I may keep my win total at 6 for 2025.

Hard to say this early. I just can't envision a big turnaround, I will say that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Yeah same here on the draft. We had complete tunnel vision on XL regardless of who else was available.

Still miffed we didn’t get one of the guys that were more obviously going to transition easily. 

DeJean, Ladd, Sainristil, Frazier…there was legit talent right there and we reached on a guy we oversold ourselves on with marginal college experience.

that's why I'm cool w/ parting w/ AT.  AT essentially took Ladd off the table.   Both would be their best version of themselves in the same spot on the field.  So strike him off the list and look at the other spots.  Which brings you to XL.   A different spot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Yeah same here on the draft. We had complete tunnel vision on XL regardless of who else was available.

Still miffed we didn’t get one of the guys that were more obviously going to transition easily. 

DeJean, Ladd, Sainristil, Frazier…there was legit talent right there and we reached on a guy we oversold ourselves on with marginal college experience.

But he talks funny!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CRA said:

that's why I'm cool w/ parting w/ AT.  AT essentially took Ladd off the table.   Both would be their best version of themselves in the same spot on the field.  So strike him off the list and look at the other spots.  Which brings you to XL.   A different spot.  

100% against that. You basically cripple the offense without AT

No player on this team should be taking anyone off the board. That's on the FO.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, maybe a guy like, IDK.....Ladd McConkey?

if you drafted Ladd, he wouldn't need to be a understudy.....he would just need to take ATs spot/role.  See this season with the Chargers as the proof.   As a rookie, Ladd is outperforming anything AT has done in a half decade on the field. 

It's why I would love AT to stay if he was an outside #2.   My AT issue is he plays the slot role and is too old to move outside.  That was the Ladd issue of the draft.  Both are suited for 1 role/job on the field.  That means you put one on the bench or make the other less effective by playing them outside their ideal role.  XL presented the option to put 2 WRs in places they would both shine to their max. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...