Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A look back at preseason predictions


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, CRA said:

if you drafted Ladd, he wouldn't need to be a understudy.....he would just need to take ATs spot/role.  See this season with the Chargers as the proof.   As a rookie, Ladd is outperforming anything AT has done in a half decade on the field. 

It's why I would love AT to stay if he was an outside #2.   My AT issue is he plays the slot role and is too old to move outside.  That was the Ladd issue of the draft.  Both are suited for 1 role/job on the field.  That means you put one on the bench or make the other less effective by playing them outside their ideal role.  XL presented the option to put 2 WRs in places they would both shine to their max. 

 

 

 

I prefer players that are capable of their jobs, hence why AT & Ladd made(and still make) far more sense than AT & XL or just XL alone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I prefer players that are capable of their jobs, hence why AT & Ladd made(and still make) far more sense than AT & XL or just XL alone. 

Ok.  You drafted Ladd.   Where you playing Ladd.  Where you playing AT

I think the XL math just presents the highest ceiling (if he was what we thought he was).....because you get two in their ideal positions on the field.   Vs just 1. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

Ok.  You drafted Ladd.   Where you playing Ladd.  Where you playing AT

 

Put them wherever you want. What is the benefit of a Mingo/TMJ/XL when they don't get open often enough nor catch the ball consistently when they do? 

I will take someone having to play out of their ideal position but will still be able to get open or make plays at a higher rate than the utterly unproductive player that they are replacing. 

I get that it's great to have the classic, stereotypical WR molds in their classic, stereotypical spots but the NFL also doesn't often work that way anymore. There are ample examples of players not fitting into these classic molds but are on the field because they make plays. 

That's what I am after, players that have the capabilities to actually impact games. Not theoretical abilities in classic molds that largely stay theoretical.

This is literally a big reason why we have failed so incredibly miserably in the last few years in these drafts. We chase RAS types that have high ceilings and abysmally low floors. It's the equivalent of investing in scratch off tickets rather than putting money in a solid investment fund.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Ok.  You drafted Ladd.   Where you playing Ladd.  Where you playing AT

I think the XL math just presents the highest ceiling (if he was what we thought he was).....because you get two in their ideal positions on the field.   Vs just 1. 

 

You can play Theilen anywhere. You don't have to just play him in the slot. Yes he's not a burner in the X but I guarantee he could get open there. Theilen is our gap filler until you fill all the wr positions as long as he wants to be. Any chance you get to go young with a good player you take it. The vet is smart enough to play other spots until the kid gets it or he himself is replaced. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

You can play Theilen anywhere. You don't have to just play him in the slot. Yes he's not a burner in the X but I guarantee he could get open there. Theilen is our gap filler until you fill all the wr positions as long as he wants to be. Any chance you get to go young with a good player you take it. The vet is smart enough to play other spots until the kid gets it or he himself is replaced. 

I just don't think you can play 2024 AT anywhere and get the same type reliability.  In 2024, he makes for a solid starting slot option.  You put him on the outside, he is not a solid starting option.  So you nerf him for Ladd.  

I'd love to see what his production is on the season lined up outside.  Which I think is about just 25% of his snaps (using a fantasy site on that).   That's why he made it to Carolina because he could no longer get it done out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I just don't think you can play 2024 AT anywhere and get the same type reliability.  In 2024, he makes for a solid starting slot option.  You put him on the outside, he is not a solid starting option.  So you nerf him for Ladd.  

I'd love to see what his production is on the season lined up outside.  Which I think is about just 25% of his snaps (using a fantasy site on that).   That's why he made it to Carolina because he could no longer get it done out there. 

Yeah at this point in his career AT is almost strictly a slot. Slot is also the best spot for Ladd. We drafted XL because our coach wanted a X WR to play that Mike Evans role. Ladd wasn’t that guy. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4-13, but not the way it has gone. i wasn't expecting garbage across the board, but the team is watchable with hope going forward. 8-9 wins next year (jets dolphins patriots will help that), then 10-11 the year after as long as we keep this offensive core and work on the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I just don't think you can play 2024 AT anywhere and get the same type reliability.  In 2024, he makes for a solid starting slot option.  You put him on the outside, he is not a solid starting option.  So you nerf him for Ladd.  

I'd love to see what his production is on the season lined up outside.  Which I think is about just 25% of his snaps (using a fantasy site on that).   That's why he made it to Carolina because he could no longer get it done out there. 

Where you put him is not an indication that it his only role. You seem to want to lock a "type" of receiver in a specific role. Is Theilen not the best receiver we currently have? Does he only play the slot? You play the hand you're dealt and Canales is throwing these guys anywhere the are capable of playing right now.

Unfortunately, only Theilen can play them all, not always well at his age but he knows how to get open. The rookies are still learning with mixed results. They are not playing them where they want to but where they have to until they draft more help.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Where you put him is not an indication that it his only role. You seem to want to lock a "type" of receiver in a specific role. Is Theilen not the best receiver we currently have? Does he only play the slot? You play the hand you're dealt and Canales is throwing these guys anywhere the are capable of playing right now.

Unfortunately, only Theilen can play them all, not always well at his age but he knows how to get open. The rookies are still learning with mixed results. They are not playing them where they want to but where they have to until they draft more help.

to me the roles/position often can matter greatly for most players. You put AT in the slot 100% of the snaps for 3 games and then do it XL.....I suspect AT outperforms XL by a noteworthy margin.  I'm not sure AT could even really outperform XL on the outside of note in this Carolina O.   So that's a pretty big difference. 

Even youngsters.  Go back in time to Curtis Samuel.  2 very different players.  Outside vs slot.  One generate a very solid WR.  One generated  meh WR. 

Then there are the prime 89s.  Who are almost just as dangerous no matter the spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

to me the roles/position often can matter greatly for most players. You put AT in the slot 100% of the snaps for 3 games and then do it XL.....I suspect AT outperforms XL by a noteworthy margin.  I'm not sure AT could even really outperform XL on the outside of note in this Carolina O.   So that's a pretty big difference. 

Even youngsters.  Go back in time to Curtis Samuel.  2 very different players.  Outside vs slot.  One generate a very solid WR.  One generated  meh WR. 

Then there are the prime 89s.  Who are almost just as dangerous no matter the spot. 

It's not a permanent assignment. Where we stand we cannot be picky about what type receivers we are looking for.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

This is just sad and shows how poorly the team has drafted and hit on free agents under Tepper. They really need to forget RAS and go after productive college players.

That would be a good start. Stop look for 10's that won't give you the time of day. Grab a 7 that can cook and enjoy a happy life.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce will be complete ass if the O-line isn’t top 10 or better so you have to shore up the tackles. 
    • Observer article    I left out the specialists which is the 3rd position  Panthers haven’t drafted three positions under Morgan: Will that change in 2026? Mike Kaye [email protected] 4 hrs ago The Carolina Panthers, two years into the Dan Morgan-Dave Canales era, have yet to draft an offensive lineman. That is likely to change in 2026. The organization has selected  three wide receivers,  two tight ends,  two running backs, two defensive backs, two defensive linemen and two outside linebackers  during the shared reign of Morgan and Canales. Those multiple selections at several positions have come at the expense of the offensive line. But there are other positions that have been avoided, too. With the 2026 NFL Scouting Combine ongoing in Indianapolis, let’s take a look at the three notable positions evaded by the organization over the past two drafts: Quarterback Last time position was drafted by Panthers:Bryce Young (first round, 2023) Impending free agents at the position: N/A Current depth chart under contract: Young, Andy Dalton   The Panthers can’t really be criticized for not selecting a quarterback over the past two years. The team invested a ton of draft capital in Young while trading up for the first overall pick in 2023. Young has legitimately rebounded from a brutal rookie year and a whirlwind 2024 season that saw him get benched for roughly a third of the campaign. The Heisman trophy-winning passer posted career-high numbers in 2025, and the Panthers have already publicly noted that they will pick up the fifth-year option on his rookie contract. So, Young will be under contract through at least the 2027 season. His longtime veteran backup, Andy Dalton, is entering the final year of his deal. Morgan hasn’t minced words when discussing his desire to add a younger QB behind Young. The Panthers are hoping to contend long term, and they’ll need to manage costs throughout the roster in order to retain their top-tier talent. Drafting a quarterback on Day 3 could provide the Panthers with a cost-effective backup for Young for years to come. That savings could then help them invest elsewhere. Dalton is guaranteed $2 million this season. If he were to be traded, the Panthers would save $4 million on the salary cap. That’s probably not enough savings to force a move, but given Morgan’s outlook on getting younger, it could lead to at least some consideration. Dalton, 38, could also be bounced if the Panthers decide to target it a younger journeyman QB in free agency. The backup quarterback spot has some offseason intrigue for the first time in a while. Offensive line Last time position was drafted by Panthers:G Chandler Zavala (fourth round, 2023) Impending free agents at the position: C Cade Mays, OT Yosh Nijman, G/C Austin Corbett, T/C Brady Christensen, G/T Jake Curhan   Current depth chart under contract: LT Ickey Ekwonu, LG Damien Lewis, C Nick Samac, RG Rob Hunt, RT Taylor Moton, Zavala, Ja’Tyre Carter, Joshua Gray, Saahdiq Charles The Panthers are set at three of their five starting positions on the offensive line. However, their outlooks at left tackle and center are certainly unenviable. Ekwonu ruptured his patellar tendon in the playoff loss to the Los Angeles Rams last month. And despite being due $17.5 million in the final year of his rookie contract, Ekwonu might miss a good portion of the 2026 seasonfollowing a notable knee surgery.   Mays, the starting center, is set to become a free agent in March. While he’s played quite well over the past two years, the Panthers might need to pass on re-signing him to improve other positions on the open market. Mays was cut by Carolina in 2024 and lost the 2025 center battle to Corbett this past summer. So, there’s reason to believe the Panthers aren’t totally sold on him being a long-term answer, either. With all that said, both positions have quite a bit of fluidity. Having Hunt and Lewis at the guard spots might make Morgan feel better about putting a rookie at center in 2026. The same sentiment, though, probably can’t be said about left tackle, as the Panthers will want to reinforce Young’s blind side with Ekwonu shelved. Nijman is likely among the internal free agents who Morgan wants to re-sign, and if that pact happens, look for the Panthers to be patient at tackle in the draft. With Christensen, Curhan, Corbett, Nijman and Mays all set to hit the market, the Panthers are likely to have several new faces on the offensive line depth chart in training camp. The Panthers will probably make multiple moves in the trenches during free agency and the draft.   Selecting a long-term swing tackle with starter upside — especially with Ekwonu set to hit free agency in 2027 — seems inevitable.  
    • Making the playoffs as quickly as he did after what he inherited was impressive.  He inherited the worst team in the league with a depleted roster, missing draft picks, and a QB who just had a historically bad rookie season.  I mean it's hard to get much worse.  I wish he would hire someone to call plays because I think that's his weakness, but maybe he can get better there as he gets experience.
×
×
  • Create New...