Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Time to draft a running back?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You can literally use the injury excuse for any position.

 

What happens if Bryce gets injured?

What happens if Horn gets injured?

 

RB is a position where you're expected to have more than one player taking snaps. QB is not.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Good points, we need depth at both positions

If you drafting for depth with a limited roster your GM is not doing something right.

 

We need starters on defense multiple. Drafting for backups is DUMB! You only do that when you have a stacked roster. We aren't the Eagles in terms of talent.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Moving the goalpost. Any player can get injured.

He didn’t move the goal posts.  You need to play multiple RBs in every single game you play.   It’s not a backup in reality, it’s part of a RB committee.   You need that in the NFL.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooks is a 2nd pick that this team Lit on fire. Dude is useless to this team for another year, unfortunately. A second rounder who won’t even play until year 3? I hope they learned from that. 

Restock RB with 4+ rounders. Big mo fos. An O line of goons will make any bruising back look like like a pro bowler. Just need someone to move the chains. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

He didn’t move the goal posts.  You need to play multiple RBs in every single game you play.   It’s not a backup in reality, it’s part of a RB committee.   You need that in the NFL.  

I understand that my friend. Listen carefully, I think we can find a backup RB in FA or sign a undrafted RB. 

 

What is wrong with my option?

 

I want Tmac and a all defense draft. If we can't get Tmac just go all defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I understand that my friend. Listen carefully, I think we can find a backup RB in FA or sign a undrafted RB. 

 

What is wrong with my option?

 

I want Tmac and an all defense draft. If we can't get Tmac just go all defense. 

RB in the draft comes with higher potential and is likely cheaper.  Especially if he turns out to be good and you want to keep him around.   Money/cap can go to harder to find positions.

position is devalued which makes RBs in that range have higher odds of actually becoming real NFL players vs other spots in that range.  It’s just a good positional bargain in the draft.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

RB in the draft comes with higher potential and is likely cheaper.  Especially if he turns out to be good and you want to keep him around.   Money/cap can go to harder to find positions.

position is devalued which makes RBs in that range have higher odds of actually becoming real NFL players vs other spots in that range.  It’s just a good positional bargain in the draft.   

We been investing in the RB position for years. Get a undrafted RB. Chuba is the real deal he doesn't need some elite RB to back him up. Just my opinion on the situation.

 

What if our current backup RB rushes for 100 yards Sunday? I mean we writing him off after 1 bad game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...