Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone got the draft scenarios for this Sunday?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

I just don't think this is like every draft.  It smells like 2013.  I just don't see the all-pro talent at the top.  It's a really poor draft at the top.  Maybe Mason Graham and Malaki Starks...but just looking relatively:    

-Mims/Fuaga would be OT1 this year easy, no questions, ahead of Banks and Campbell. 

-Hunter & McMillan are more on a Drake London level than a Chase, Nabers, or Marv. Would take Rome ahead of both.

-The top pass rushers would be going in the 20s or beyond most other years. 

-Overall, I like the interior DL, depth of the RB and Pass Rusher classes, and the safeties.  But this is a pretty iffy group compared to most years in R1.  

 

Yep.  Move back if you can--I think we could go S if Starks is there, but I would not draft a S with the needs we have.  I also think your comments about WR are spot on.  I think adding CB Will Johnson might be the move--and I would get it--

Abdul?  Not sold yet.  Graham?  I keep seeing him in Panther blue when I fall asleep when texting while driving.  Odd.

And someone is going to take Jeanty in round 1 and will have a stud RB for a half decade that teams have to game plan around. He is one of about 2-3 top players in this draft.

Using the "inside out, front to back" logic of meeting needs, Graham makes the most sense, but the draft is deep at DT, imo.  If I am the GM (and we all know I should be), I trade back and add a second rounder.

Not many people are talking about Ohio State WR Emeka Egbuka.  He had 900 yards while playing in the shadow of generational talent Jeremiah Smith (1200 yards).  I think he is pretty quiet right now--he suffered some injuries in 2023, but had over 1100 yards in 2022.  If we move back, maybe?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the patriots beat the bills (which I called like 3 weeks ago), that Cardinals win is going to end up costing us the #1 pick in the draft.

But sure, go on telling me how that one win is going to help this team in the future because it helped build a winning culture.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, general consensus is when we could get third lose we won't drop any further than nine. Correct? 

As much as I'd like to beat the crap out of Atlanta and in their playoff run, there's a big damn difference between three and nine. Anyway you look at it, I'm also a Tampa Bay fan today. It doesn't hurt that they're playing New Orleans. F*** New Orleans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

CLE and NE are ahead...highest pick is 3 if we lose.  

Games with implications w/a loss:

3 win teams (we have lower SOS than both so leap frog if we lose, they win):

Titans vs. Texans - Texans sound to be resting their starters.  Although, unsure if they want to limp into the playoffs.  And Titans could still lose to backups.  But winnable game, they did beat HOU this year before the Texans defense made a turnaround.  

Giants vs. Eagles - Eagles are resting certain starters vs the Giants.  Again, a situation where the Iggles backups could still take care of things.

4 win teams:

Jaguars vs. Colts - I don't know what will happen here.  But both teams are in disarray.  

Jets vs Dolphins - Tua is out but the Dolphins still have a chance at the playoffs with a DEN loss.  Interesting one to watch for since we have the same SOS right now. 

Raiders vs. Chargers - Chargers have playoff seeding on the line, could clean up.  

Bears vs. Packers - Seeding is on the line, Packers are not resting starters.  

-

TL,DR: There's so much going on, I'm just going to split it and say we stay around 6.  There's no particular guy we're missing out on in this draft IMO.  There's no "OMG we have to get him" talent.  I don't think Graham, Johnson, or McMillan are that.  We end up where we end up.  

I wouldn't mind moving up to 5. The two defense guys I would like to see us have a choice on would be Johnson or Graham out of Michigan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Yep.  Move back if you can--I think we could go S if Starks is there, but I would not draft a S with the needs we have.  I also think your comments about WR are spot on.  I think adding CB Will Johnson might be the move--and I would get it--

Abdul?  Not sold yet.  Graham?  I keep seeing him in Panther blue when I fall asleep when texting while driving.  Odd.

And someone is going to take Jeanty in round 1 and will have a stud RB for a half decade that teams have to game plan around. He is one of about 2-3 top players in this draft.

Using the "inside out, front to back" logic of meeting needs, Graham makes the most sense, but the draft is deep at DT, imo.  If I am the GM (and we all know I should be), I trade back and add a second rounder.

Not many people are talking about Ohio State WR Emeka Egbuka.  He had 900 yards while playing in the shadow of generational talent Jeremiah Smith (1200 yards).  I think he is pretty quiet right now--he suffered some injuries in 2023, but had over 1100 yards in 2022.  If we move back, maybe?

 

I would be seriously upset if they picked Starks in round one.  Graham did have another first round DT right next to him for whatever that’s worth.  Agree with you on trading back if it brings another 2nd especially if our target is gone 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pats are ahead of us no matter what.  

Jags are looking iffy against Indy. 

Giants can't move the ball vs. Philly, that looks out of reach.

So...if we lose, still looking at it like this:

1/2 CLE/NE 

3 TEN

4 NYG 

5 JAX 

6 BEST CASE CAR  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Or possibly McMillian the WR.

Yea Leggette is not having the rookie year I assumed he would have, but I have the feeling Coker will be the man in Carolina for the next two to 3 years unless we get McMillian, but I see the Panthers needing defense more than a 1st round offensive player this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

I would be seriously upset if they picked Starks in round one.  Graham did have another first round DT right next to him for whatever that’s worth.  Agree with you on trading back if it brings another 2nd especially if our target is gone 

gotta focus on inside out, front to back--so I think we could trade back--if there is a demand.  Looks like we are going around #8.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Poster board? Were you trying to use the term poster child?
    • I mean, you're acting like we don't see the tippy-toe bunny hops, jump throws more than normal (with both feet dangling in the air every which a way), and off-platform but off-balance throws that arrive short or sail high. Could that be bad mechanics due to being short? Could a seeming propensity to bail the pocket towards the sidelines early as opposed to sitting in the pocket tall and strong, surveying his reads, be an attempt at trying to see an open throwing lane? I'm not saying that what you're saying isn't a contributing factor to what has been an underwhelming display of executing the QB position, but this is year three, and if the lightbulb hasn't switched on by now---if you haven't figured out that guys are faster, stronger and generally more athletic, then what's it going to take? It's hard to forget that "mental processing" was supposed to be Bryce Young's superpower. Are you telling me that he can't nail down such an easy concept as, "I can't get away with the things I did in college at the pro level," is that right? If he can't get past that, then that surely limits his ability to successfully execute all the other stuff.  Look, I'm not trying to be flippant. I acknowledge that playing pro football is more complex than a lot of fans realize, but all we can do, as fans, is observe. One of my favorite things to do is just look at the greater picture and think what part human nature is playing in the many decisions that are being made or have to be made. You're absolutely correct that fans don't know exactly what's going on, but that is by design, and in many ways it's just the nature of the beast. Some things we can't know. That being said, the professionals screw the hell up all the time. The professionals disagree all the time. These disagreements can be within the same franchise or from franchise to franchise. And sometimes these decisions are all over the place, so excuse me if I ain't exactly buying the I-know-more-than-thee sentiment and that that means that professionals always make better decisions than fans would about certain players. Some of this stuff is simply luck or a crapshoot.
×
×
  • Create New...