Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jack Sawyer


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Depends on workouts/combine/etc. I suspect he will end up in the last first to early second range.

I suspect his numbers won’t jump off athletically but he’s a damn good football player 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

IDK. I would say his his floor is higher than almost anyone mocked ahead of him. Most of the guys mocked in the top 15-20 as DE/EDGE guys have astronomical bust factors, IMO.

This so much. Gotta stop drafting potential based on athleticism. Need an edge that will be consistently tough against the run and consistently pressure the QB. Rather have that guy than a 14 sack guy that disappears for 9/10 of every game. Need football players. Not crossfit champions. 

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I like Gillote. Isn't he going to be at the Senior Bowl?

Yeah I believe so.

I like a few things about his game:

-Great run defender, good awareness to break off engagement and quickly move laterally.  His twitch and quickness is legit.

-Moveset: has a nice swim, power rush (against guards and tackles).  Good bend but he just thrives in the trenches. His power seems to be a top strength which I like for us.

-Good size and provides versatility.  He's 6'3 275, and a quick dude.  Evero tends to flex in guys like Clowney in nickel packages which we could do with someone like Gillote.  

-Combining the high motor, strength, size, quickness, he easily has 3-down ability. 

Overall, he's the type that will get a us pushing OLs backwards quicker.  Need that type of EDGE who isn't afraid to go at it in the trenches. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nina King continues to run circles around the rest of college basketball. She's been ahead of the curve on everything, and is the biggest reason for Duke's success post-K IMO. I think Scheyer is great at many things, but Duke went into the NIL era 100% ready whereas everyone else was playing catchup. 
    • Happy they won convincingly instead of letting them hang around. Montreal is cooked, and rather than play hockey, they've decided to take some really cheap shots at guys. I get a player may feel a need to set the tone, and I understand how that works. But to 2-hand cross check someone intentionally in the face, to have a guy down on the ice and put his head into the ice with a stick, to just start punching anyone who gets within arm's reach- that's not setting the tone. That is nothing short of playing dirty.  That said, the Canes.... oh boy. They could have run this score to 6-0 with half a power play. It's embarrassing how bad the PP is. If the Canes go to the Cup finals against a team who scores at least 1 goal per game on the PP, they'll lose the close games because of the lack of results on the PP. 
    • Because he knows they are winning the cup. And I fully support his decision. 
×
×
  • Create New...