Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He takes some horrific hits. He did in college too. He definitely needs to learn to protect himself a little better when running. Slid, get out of bounds, whatever. He's not built to run through defenders like a Cam or Josh Allen.

It's literally a re-run so far without the knee injury.  RG3 took the league by storm with the read option mixup game.  He was basically a 1 read QB that year and their offense was electric.  It's very similar to their offense this past year.  RG3 also looked like a rag doll every time he got hit.  Kliff Kingsbury has created an offense that is very friendly to a new QB, and emphasizes Daniels' strengths.

I just hope he can stay healthy.  He's fun to watch.  But I agree with your original point.  Rookie impact does not directly mean that they will progress from there in a linear fashion.  This could very well be his best season.  Only time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Eagles are a confusing team for me.  Barkley has been awesome, but Moore's offense tends to go through some self-inflicted lulls.  Very beatable.

The Lions are a bit injury bitten.  

The Commanders & the winner of tonight have decent shots.

Now being mostly healthy, the Rams may be the ones positioned for a run.  

If I'm going off purely momentum right now, Rams - Ravens could be an interesting SB that not many saw coming.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, fanpanther said:

I actually think the texans have a good chance against kansas city.  predicting texans vs lions. 

I agree with the first part. I don't think they get through Ravens or Bills though. Their defenses stop the run and pressure the QB. That's HOU's kryptonite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HaricotVert said:

There are shitty people in every fan base.

Watched a bunch of drunk Panthers fans ask a 10ish year old in a Culpepper jersey how he thought his QB was going to ever run again after getting carted out on BoA on 10/30/05

There just seems to be an abnormally high percentage of them in that particular fanbase.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is why everyone universally hates Eagles fans.

https://x.com/Basaraski/status/1878695599484346675?t=QWLZFLIctCn_1WNSkNFBDw&s=19

I wouldn't stand for fellow Panthers fans treating rival fans like this.

It is really sad when you see a person that age acting like that at a sporting event.

Edited by Deltek44
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...