Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Update Rankings - Notable ED shifts


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Icege said:

Just started my armchair scouting this week with the EDGE guys.

Not very impressed with Mykel Williams, was disappointed that JT Tuimoloau seemed to decline a bit from last season, and was impressed with Jack Sawyer's motor but he reminds me of YGM with better hand-fighting. To be fair to all of them, I've got only two games each reviewed so far.

Abdul Carter is a freak.

I'm very eager to dive into the Mike Green film. Got a feeling that he's long gone by the time the Panthers get to make their second selection (whether or not they trade up) but going to hold on to hope!

I think, after Carter, I would like Green.  I also think Pearce is better than advertised right now. Green seems to be a better "all around" edge player.  Good against the run, pass, etc.   Carter, Green, Pearce--first round; Sawyer is my preference for round 2.  Love him.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I have read various perspectives, some with Sanders going mid round, but I think there will be 2 QBs going in the top 5.  With the exception of the Kenny Pickett year, most years QBs creep up boards the closer we get to April.  This is going to sound crazy, but I could see will Howard going in round 1.  How you perform on the biggest stage carries a lot of weight.  Depending on what Rodgers decides in his Oregon black hole of meditation, it is possible that only Jax and NE (picking before us) do not need a QB--five of seven teams.  How do you not take Sanders if he is sitting there? Someone will bite.  Furthermore, Jalen Milroe reminds me of Anthony Richardson who was drafted fairly early, and Quinn Ewers reminds me of Bo Nix.  All it takes is one team (see Pickett, Kenny).  Howard's stock is about to explode--I think he goes round 1--I could see a team like the Raiders, Colts, or Steelers taking Howard.  Once the chips start getting pushed to the center of the table, people will overpay.

 

I don't know, I don't see who's stock could realistically rise this draft.  These guys just aren't that good of prospects and the tape ain't great either.   

Milroe is a bit more like a Kellen Mond for me.  Not as physically imposing as AR.  Has the dual ability, athletic traits, arm, but really no feel as a QB (okay, some similarities lol).  All the essentials like pocket awareness, anticipation throws, seeing the layers of live play, it's just not what you want as a QB.  Zone-read skills, but no consistency and hasn't really shown he can be that field general.  Lower than expected adjusted percentages, SUPER low pressure grades.  Just a toolsy-QB IMO.

Nix was way more consistent his final year than Ewers and is way more accurate with his deep balls.  In addition, Ewers does not have the agility Nix has.  Think they're quite different.  Something just hasn't clicked yet with QE.  He never found his go-to "guy" in school, really had a problem finding and staying in rhythm.  And for having so much talent around him, he just never produced what you think he should have.  Nix on the other hand was able to go bonkers with Tez, Bucky & Franklin at Oregon, also just had excellent mechanics and good velocity that could trick you to thinking his arm's more powerful than it is.  

Kyle McCord could be a guy to watch.  But at highest, he could rise to R2.  

I just see Ward & Sanders at the top, but I'm unsure I'd even classify them as 1sts.  Many speculated (Brugler, Sando, others) before decisions were made last year that Ward was viewed as a 4th rounder at best developmental...and that was after 2 really positive seasons at WSU.  This may not be common sentiment, but I wouldn't take Ward or Sanders over Penix or Nix.  

 

  

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

I don't know, I don't see who's stock could realistically rise this draft.  These guys just aren't that good of prospects and the tape ain't great either.   

Milroe is a bit more like a Kellen Mond for me.  Not as physically imposing as AR.  Has the dual ability, athletic traits, arm, but really no feel as a QB (okay, some similarities lol).  All the essentials like pocket awareness, anticipation throws, seeing the layers of live play, it's just not what you want as a QB.  Zone-read skills, but no consistency and hasn't really shown he can be that field general.  Lower than expected adjusted percentages, SUPER low pressure grades.  Just a toolsy-QB IMO.

Nix was way more consistent his final year than Ewers and is way more accurate with his deep balls.  In addition, Ewers does not have the agility Nix has.  Think they're quite different.  Something just hasn't clicked yet with QE.  He never found his go-to "guy" in school, really had a problem finding and staying in rhythm.  And for having so much talent around him, he just never produced what you think he should have.  Nix on the other hand was able to go bonkers with Tez, Bucky & Franklin at Oregon, also just had excellent mechanics and good velocity that could trick you to thinking his arm's more powerful than it is.  

Kyle McCord could be a guy to watch.  But at highest, he could rise to R2.  

I just see Ward & Sanders at the top, but I'm unsure I'd even classify them as 1sts.  Many speculated (Brugler, Sando, others) before decisions were made last year that Ward was viewed as a 4th rounder at best developmental...and that was after 2 really positive seasons at WSU.  This may not be common sentiment, but I wouldn't take Ward or Sanders over Penix or Nix.  

 

  

 

I think the Jayden Daniels success will entice desperate teams--maybe too much of an assumption and generalization, but I am confident that Ward and Sanders go early--I would also point out that in the days of Portal, you get to see QBs in different systems--when Bo Nix was at Oregon, I had a low opinion of him from his Auburn days.  On the other hand, if a QB can demonstrate adaptability and make a transition work, scouts have more to work with--I am just waiting to see how this new generation of college players is evaluated.  (Does that make sense?)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

I don't know, I don't see who's stock could realistically rise this draft.  These guys just aren't that good of prospects and the tape ain't great either.   

Milroe is a bit more like a Kellen Mond for me.  Not as physically imposing as AR.  Has the dual ability, athletic traits, arm, but really no feel as a QB (okay, some similarities lol).  All the essentials like pocket awareness, anticipation throws, seeing the layers of live play, it's just not what you want as a QB.  Zone-read skills, but no consistency and hasn't really shown he can be that field general.  Lower than expected adjusted percentages, SUPER low pressure grades.  Just a toolsy-QB IMO.

Nix was way more consistent his final year than Ewers and is way more accurate with his deep balls.  In addition, Ewers does not have the agility Nix has.  Think they're quite different.  Something just hasn't clicked yet with QE.  He never found his go-to "guy" in school, really had a problem finding and staying in rhythm.  And for having so much talent around him, he just never produced what you think he should have.  Nix on the other hand was able to go bonkers with Tez, Bucky & Franklin at Oregon, also just had excellent mechanics and good velocity that could trick you to thinking his arm's more powerful than it is.  

Kyle McCord could be a guy to watch.  But at highest, he could rise to R2.  

I just see Ward & Sanders at the top, but I'm unsure I'd even classify them as 1sts.  Many speculated (Brugler, Sando, others) before decisions were made last year that Ward was viewed as a 4th rounder at best developmental...and that was after 2 really positive seasons at WSU.  This may not be common sentiment, but I wouldn't take Ward or Sanders over Penix or Nix.  

 

  

 

Meme Reaction GIF by Robert E Blackmon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will say, as I've dug into things, Mike Green is absolutely legit.  

There are only 3 appropriately-sized guys in this class with over a 20% PR win rate, 99 percentile PR skills:

Abdul Carter, James Pierce, & Mike Green.  All 3 of those guys are 3-4 molds, but not undersized or poor in run-d grade by any means. Will say, Pierce would not be a bad option at 8 if Graham IDL & Johnson DB are gone.  Those 3 are the top.  I find it hard to dispute.  Gillette arguably falls into this category, but his run-d isn't at their level or else he'd be viewed much higher in this class.  

Then comes the appeal of Jalon Walker who's this offball/edge hybrid.  Overall, just a stud football player.

Then there's the consistent, hard-nose, above average type in Sawyer.  Nothing flashy, but he's a known commodity, seems like a dude primed to join an upper midwest team.  

But the guys floating around 10% PR win rates that aren't necessarily stud run defenders, I just don't want much part of.  Mykel, Shermar, Kennard are the types that worry me.  

Now, the pass rush specialists, give me those guys like JT, Princely (stud), Donavon Ez in R2-4...instantly insert them into our sub packages, PR downs and let them cook.  

Some really interesting options.

  

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2025 at 9:23 AM, NCBlu said:

Lots of 240-ish edge rushers.

That's like ILB size. The guy from Tenn do seem to make plays even at his size.

RTs are going to love this class 

Orrrrr

3-4 OLB size

 

which if you didn’t know.  We’re keeping Evero around and sticking with the 3-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...