Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jalon Walker player comp: Haason Reddick


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

I do agree and Im sure Ive said it before, players should be in full uniforms. The weight of that use to add 15 some LBs, not that with current tech. I agree there are gamers and suck at testing and there are workout warriors that are SOFT...

Just the game has changed, it favors speed, quickness, twitched up players are play makers. Sure the thinking and film watchers still make plays, but they are not for long if they lose some speed/quickness. Just the current game, tough went a long way.....now with all the rule changes and protection of players, tough guys can not will their way onto the team and stay for 10 years. 

Have you seen this, 30 is now a fossil in the NFL. They can still play, but price and twitch/quick/speed wise, they can not compete will the rookies... and each year there's like 1,000 players and 350 take jobs form those slower guys who just had 120 tacks....

I totally get it, but drafting players based on athletic ability and trying to project who they may become as they lose a step is a HORRIBLE way to draft players, it's how you end up with the Mingo's of the world

Outside of players with pre-existing health concerns, you can't draft based on who they might become in 5-7 years after they get worn down, you draft them for who you think they can become as a player and you hope they can stay healthy.

College Nick Foles is always someone I look back on when talking about practice vs games.

When he transferred to Arizona, he lost the starting QB spot in camp/practice, and badly so, to the point where it wasn't even close.  After a few games of the starter struggling, he got his shot, ran away with the job, set basically every Arizona passing record, was a 3rd round pick, ended up winning a SB and making a ton of money.  But even for his 3 years in college, it was a constant discussion point about how he was terrible in practice, even as a Senior when he was years long entrenched as our starter, it was talked about how bad he was in practice for some reason.  

I realize that's one extreme example, but it's always stuck with me when talking about how some players are just gamers, and when it's a real game, for whatever reason, they just play differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Bro, did you see that Morgan combine interview I posted here. If you listen, he uses RAS talk when talking what he wants. It's on front page. He was give some insight and not much GM-speak 

Dear God....us and the fuging RAS obsession.

Did the ghost of Al Davis haunt us when JR died??

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I totally get it, but drafting players based on athletic ability and trying to project who they may become as they lose a step is a HORRIBLE way to draft players, it's how you end up with the Mingo's of the world

Outside of players with pre-existing health concerns, you can't draft based on who they might become in 5-7 years after they get worn down, you draft them for who you think they can become as a player and you hope they can stay healthy.

College Nick Foles is always someone I look back on when talking about practice vs games.

When he transferred to Arizona, he lost the starting QB spot in camp/practice, and badly so, to the point where it wasn't even close.  After a few games of the starter struggling, he got his shot, ran away with the job, set basically every Arizona passing record, was a 3rd round pick, ended up winning a SB and making a ton of money.  But even for his 3 years in college, it was a constant discussion point about how he was terrible in practice, even as a Senior when he was years long entrenched as our starter, it was talked about how bad he was in practice for some reason.  

I realize that's one extreme example, but it's always stuck with me when talking about how some players are just gamers, and when it's a real game, for whatever reason, they just play differently.

 

It is a balancing act, its close to this

 

images.png.c785e97984d54313e5665040429e5e6e.png

 

We both want the same goal- wins and production, there are different paths/lanes to improve each. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Weighing in at 243 probably gets him to us and cements him as an ILB, and I'm more than okay with that.  

He is a ILB/OLB depending on what defense he's in. I suspect he will play both here as Evero likes to switch it up during games. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

He is a ILB/OLB depending on what defense he's in. I suspect he will play both here as Evero likes to switch it up during games. 

I agree with that.  I just think if he had weighed in at 250+ he would have shot up the board as a true edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...