Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales on TE spot from Char observer


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

you should care, thats the exact point.  There is something called analytics, odds, past history etc that lay out quite clearly that taking a TE in the first much less in the goddamn top 10 is fuging moronic and pans out about 5% of the time if that

Oh, since it's just stats and hit rate you care about.

image.png.b44ed51044ce134714f1639e6fe75989.png

According to this, nobody should take any position but centers and RBs in the first round.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Oh, since it's just stats and hit rate you care about.

image.png.b44ed51044ce134714f1639e6fe75989.png

According to this, nobody should take any position but centers and RBs in the first round.

yeah I am going to need some context to whatever this is

 

or you could read this  https://x.com/SheilKapadia/status/1779873360190620080?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1779873360190620080|twgr^ff940ba10db64f79986523b3f835beddd5ea894f|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redditmedia.com%2Fmediaembed%2F1c4n4jd%2F%3Fresponsive%3Dtrueis_nightmode%3Dfalse

 

or use this in your research

how many of these dudes would you go back and pick in the first?  The odds are literally astronomical that a TE hits in his first contract

 

 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

TE in the first doesn’t make sense. This is a deep overall TE class. There will be talented TEs in the 2nd/3rd rounds.

Bowers is the only one in recent memory took in the 1st, that has panned out.
 

It doesn’t exactly work like that. You really have Warren, then Arroyo , Loveland and Taylor and not much else. Fannin was just ok at the Senior Bowl and others have major holes in their game. Who’s to say they aren’t all gone at 57 or whenever we pick in round 2, much less round 3. I’m not advocating a TE or a S in the top 10. But if we stand pat at 8, I am advocating for as close as we can get to a sure thing. Production+Athleticism+intangibles make sure all those boxes are checked. Luke Kuechly was pick 9. Give me that type of player at whatever position when you are picking in that 5-10 range. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Just what the chart says, hit rates by position for the first round. It's for 2013-2017 and I got it from here, but if that doesn't work for you, I have another.

GL72nOcWMAAQHLU.thumb.jpg.378af2f8e5cd2a04f09315f9ca8bb6ea.jpg

This chart shows the hit rate of 2000-2019. And it came from here, here, and here.

I get they have to define "hit" and "miss" somehow but this is bit simple

 

A “hit” was defined as a drafted player who signs a second contract with the team that they played their rookie contract on. This could be a player like Joey Bosa who was drafted by the Chargers, played his rookie contract, and was given a second contract. Another example could be Jalen Ramsey who was traded during his rookie contract but signed an extension with his new team, the Rams.

For the record this would show Ian Thomas as a "hit".  Would you agree with that?

but nonetheless it clearly shows TE's show more value later in their careers. IE Greg Olson, Jason Witten etc

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

yeah I am going to need some context to whatever this is

 

or you could read this  https://x.com/SheilKapadia/status/1779873360190620080?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1779873360190620080|twgr^ff940ba10db64f79986523b3f835beddd5ea894f|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redditmedia.com%2Fmediaembed%2F1c4n4jd%2F%3Fresponsive%3Dtrueis_nightmode%3Dfalse

 

or use this in your research

how many of these dudes would you go back and pick in the first?  The odds are literally astronomical that a TE hits in his first contract

 

 

I remember wanting Enron big time 

Edited by Move the Panthers to Raleigh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

For the record this would show Ian Thomas as a "hit".  Would you agree with that?

Thomas wasn't a first round pick. He was a fourth, so stop shifting goalposts.

And since those charts are what's out there to go by, you ok with just drafting centers, tackles, and guards in the first? Are you also alright with never drafting another first round WR(especially in the top ten), no matter who they are(Harrison jr for example), since they hit even less than TEs do?

Speaking of Harrison Jr, he didn't even put up 900 yards last season, so he couldn't have been worth his draft status by your logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Thomas wasn't a first round pick. He was a fourth, so stop shifting goalposts.

And since those charts are what's out there to go by, you ok with just drafting centers, tackles, and guards in the first? Are you also alright with never drafting another first round WR(especially in the top ten), no matter who they are(Harrison jr for example), since they hit even less than TEs do?

Speaking of Harrison Jr, he didn't even put up 900 yards last season, so he couldn't have been worth his draft status by your logic.

Of the 24 tes drafted in the first round since 2000.   How many do you personally think were worth the pick?   Simple question 

 

Now do the same for tes in the top 10.   Just answer the question 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Of the 24 tes drafted in the first round since 2000.   How many do you personally think were worth the pick?   Simple question 

 

Now do the same for tes in the top 10.   Just answer the question 

We played that game last week. You can go back in the post history and read the answer if you want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another prospect to keep an eye on is Michael Mayer with the Raiders. Rumor is that they are looking to trade him given Brock Bowers already being a super star. I wouldn't be mad if we traded a 4th or 5th rounder for him, dude had talent coming out. If we do go with Warren, I'm can imagine him taking the snap and us emulating our own version of "the tush push." 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think they changed as much as you think between the INT and the final sack (immediate pressure with 4 linemen). They definitely stopped blitzing as much, if a blitz means rushing more than the front 4/5. They definitely did some exotic packages where they sent LBs/DBs and dropped linemen into coverage though. The fumble and INT were both blitzes. And yes they were successful. And yes, I agreed with Bryce not taking care of the ball. Really not many answers on those plays - just take the sack and live another play (unless you're Lamar). Which he didn't do. And no, you can't run prevent on the goal line. What's prevent defense to you? Alignment, personnel, cushion, etc.? Just curious. My reply was to the post that they sat back in some soft zone the whole game - until the end, when it mattered. That's not true. They blitzed, they disguised coverages and blitzers, they pressed, they bailed, they covered the flats, all of that. Not trying to argue. Just trying to inform. Actually they only blitzed once on the final drive, and the DB got away with a bad hold on Tremayne. Otherwise looked like it would have been a completion for a first down. The Cardinals' final drive defense looked a lot like the rest of the game.  I know it's easy to get upset after a lose (I'm guilty), but Mondays are when cooler heads prevail. Right? Emotions can make us seem like we don't know what we're talking about. The Huddle isn't supposed to be that. I always saw it as a place to go discuss the Carolina Panthers with more than the casual fan, and their emotionally charged opinions. I can get that at the local grocery store, where they don't know anything about NC/SC, let alone the Panthers. 
    • Poor guy went from the Ravens to this disaster
    • You have to make the best of it and find moments of happiness.  So, I picked up the Falcons D in my money league for this week. 
×
×
  • Create New...