Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any interest in Kyle Juszczyk?


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Aussie Tank said:

They lost Deebo and still cut him there has to be a reason 

Money and age.  He is 33 and was due a pretty big chunk. They netted something like $4 mil savings on the cap.

His play has not dropped off at all but admittedly, he probably is shopping for a contender rather than another paycheck.

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Could find multiple way to use him. I think he'd be a great addition. 

I agree. I don't think he fits with our current youth movement, however. Love the player, though.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

We are currently constructed on offense as a ram it down your throat rushing team. He would also add an element of being a reliable safety valve for the QB.

What say you, Huddle? Get one of the last true FB's in the NFL?

I’d love it. We can’t use our QB in those 3rd/4th and 1 goal situations. Chuba might go for 2k with a legit lead blocker and this line. Plus like you said dude can catch and pass block. I think Bryce should be running bootlegs and some waggles and such anyways. 
His experience would be asset I think. Hopefully we see some good smart moves today

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Lol at best receiver at TE, or RB....

He catches dump offs and the occasional wheel, or depth completion off misdirection.

Age 33, no real YAC potential...I'm good.

They could use Tremble more in some of that role then. Fb/h back is highly underrated imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the style of game that Bryce plays, I could see Kyle being a huge benefit. Having a true H-Back that can stay in and block, catch, and run at times? At this point, I'm all for going more physical on offense, as I was under Wilks and in hoping we would retain him. 

I think getting Kyle, drafting Skattebo and Tyler Warren, and picking up a shifty receiver to learn under and around Adam, would be all this offense is missing.

I'd also like Mekhi Becton. I don't want him to start. I just want him as an extra tight end in goal line situations with Tyler Warren and Cam Skattebo lined up in the backfield to take either the tush push or to do a sort of wild cat play. You could also have Kyle back there because he can both block and catch. 

That would be a nearly unstoppable force within 5 yards of the goal line, every time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...