Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers re-sign Brady Christiansen


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Brady Christensen re-signs with panthers Carolina Panthers logo

Grade: A

Versatile offensive lineman Brady Christensen is coming back to the Carolina Panthers on a one-year deal worth just under $2.8 million.

Christensen has filled in admirably at tackle, guard, and center over his time in Carolina, and that kind of versatility can be hard to come by. It's a great depth signing, especially given the importance of competent OL play in the NFL.

https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-free-agency-2025-grades-for-every-signing-trade/

The players that have resigned have indicated they preferred to be in Carolina. This is a positive reflection of the coaching staff, something we have not seen often. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I would make him a swing tackle first, reserve guard second.  We have Zavala, who played well.  The OL is set.

Corbett, Mays, Lewis, Hunt, Ekwonu, Moton, Zavala, Christensen, Nijman

I doubt we keep more than nine on the roster, so these hybrids are valuable.  I expect the Panthers to draft a RT to play behind Moton and to take the RT job in a year.

HOWEVER, BC can play RT and at age 29, he could compete for RT.  I wonder if this depth behind Moton prevents the Panthers from drafting a RT this year? 

I hope we did not overpay--no more than $3-4m.

He was better at C than G tbh either way great depth piece as he's always been, serviceable all over the line and played excellent at C when called apon.

 

In fact he didn't play a single snap at guard last year 

Screenshot_20250312_091332_Chrome.jpg

Edited by PantherChris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

The lines are looking good and deep.  When could we ever say that about both?

Knocks on wood as saying this, hopefully we can stay healthy on them because that's were you win football games.... 

Our starting 5 on the oline all returning.... hasn't happened in a long time and they were SOLIDLY top 10 by the end of the year I suspect they will be even better this year with even more continuity.... easily could be the best line we have ever had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BC is a natural OT from the waist down.  His arms are fairly short, which gets you moved inside in the NFL.  However, he is not bad outside.  I had been mocking a RT to us.  With BC, I am not sure we need to do so any longer.  Mays can play T as well, so I think we might be set.  If a RT is sitting there and is a great value, take him, but if not, don't go looking.  We should be fine.  We have depth at C (Corbett, Mays), depth at G (Lewis, Hunt, Zavala) and Depth at T (Ekwonu, Moton, BC).  I think we can say goodbye to Nijman and do not need a RT in the draft unless it is simply a steal.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good. We needed a nice value signing. It’s still funny how much we overvalue our guys even with winning 2-7 wins a year over 7 years. People mentioned we might lose BC to a starting contract elsewhere. He’s a good backup but clearly no one is giving a 29 year old backup a huge deal. I think he’s thinking his best chance at starting is if Moton retires or is released in the next couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...