Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You all decide...


Zod

Recommended Posts

Personally, I find it pathetic when fans of a team post threads about individuals that used to play for the Panthers. Its the football equivalent of google stalking your ex-girlfriend. But it seems to be a popular thing. Allow it in the panthers forum or no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a problem when the discussion is on filling a gap as it relates to current players because the skill set is the same and a norm has been established, but Jake is a Brown and Peppers is a Bear. I don't want Peppers to succeed but I would like to see Jake go out on a high note. However, the current players are all that really matter, so don't give me the statistical updates of ex-Panthers every game. That is a bit wack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All non-current Panthers ( meaning they aren't Panthers anymore ) should be posted in the NFL section, or the smack section. Leave this section strictly for Panthers news. It isn't hard to read and people should have been posting things in its proper place anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'll be one of the first to disagree. I think it depends obviously the situation varies. If someone eventually posts that through 6 games Peppers has been nonexistent I definitely have NO problem seeing that...it's actually something I would WANT to see and discuss. Though I would hate for it to become a FEATURED topic on the forum to the point it begins to take over, so an occasional thread that talks about the players current production is no problem to me (same reason why I read the Jake thread about him going 6-7).

But understand this is the Panthers Forum; so it's TECHNICALLY in the wrong place...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Them playing behind a couple more seasoned guys until they get familiar with coverage and pace of play is a good thing though. We really can use them to spell the other guys, and in situational ball especially with Ransom on possible run/blitzing downs.
    • They fuged him over so bad to help cover their bad judgement. About time he got a little something to wrk with. 
    • I think completion percentage is a bit of a overinflated stat for a qb too. People place to much stock into it. So many factors to consider with it : receivers, how many attempts are made deep, the defense etc all play a roll in it. When it’s considerably low 50% or less the QB accuracy can come into question. But I don’t think it’s necessarily one of the better percentages to put so much importance into for that position. General effectiveness is far more indicative of the QB you have. First downs, 3rd and 4th down conversions, points scored and clutch plays IMO is how you grade a QB. Always bothered the poo out of me how people downed Cam for his completion percentage and that’s what they used to disregard him as an all time great. Dude damn near averaged 3tds to 1 turnover a game and was an obvious difference maker for us.
×
×
  • Create New...