Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I blame Marty Hurney and the Pike pick


CRA

Recommended Posts

Nothing against Tony.

With Moore and Clausen at the top of the depth chart. We needed a vet QB. To teach them and to come in and provide average QB play if needed. That guy is needed.

that single move turned this from a middle of the pack team to THE worst team in the NFL in 2010. Dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even close to being a top issue.

No, the top issue is Fox being brought back for a lame duck season and JR prepping for a lockout that imo likely won't occur.

this is the reason we are the worst team in the NFL instead of bad/average at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a million and one things wrong with this team and almost all of 'em are huge. I would say, if you're talking specifically about QB play, lack of a veteran QB to help the young guys is a major factor. If you're talking about the offense overall, then it's too complicated and you can point at the OL, lack of experience at WR, terrible playcalling (makes me wonder why they bother even having a first down...)...

gah. there's so much wrong with this team, and there's no real way it'll get fixed any time soon. JR owes his players and his fans an apology, but we won't get one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Therefore the luxury of drafting a Pike in the 7th was not ours...no matter the value.

I agree that with Moore, Claussen...having an serviceable veteran would have been really good. Mark Brunell is behind Mark Sanchez...for a reason.

A Jeff Garcia would be a god send here ...but enough about lispy backup QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...