Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodson is a father...

CatMan72

By CatMan72,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
Posted

Per Rotoworld:

pixel.gifpixel.gif

Panthers RB Mike Goodson missed a second straight practice Thursday for personal reasons.

Goodson is attending to the birth of his child, and coach John Fox fully expects him to play Sunday. The Seahawks run defense has fallen apart since mid-October, allowing 190+ yards in three of the past five weeks. It should be easy sledding for Goodson and Jonathan Stewart.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&filter_teams=CAR&id=5281

Seahawks defense has been allowing 5 yards per carry, so hopefully Goodson can be their daddy on Sunday as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Are you sure you want Goodson to have a big day with that Luck Sig?lol

LOL, I'm very conflicted right now...

I want to see Stewart and Goodson do well, but I also want DeAngelo back.

I don't want to root for us to lose, but I want us to be in a position to draft Luck.

:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

LOL, I'm very conflicted right now...

I want to see Stewart and Goodson do well, but I also want DeAngelo back.

I don't want to root for us to lose, but I want us to be in a position to draft Luck.

:confused:

Same here. Its a sucky situation hoping your players do well but not too well LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ElkinPanthersFan Rookie

ElkinPanthersFan

Posted
Posted

LOL, I'm very conflicted right now...

I want to see Stewart and Goodson do well, but I also want DeAngelo back.

I don't want to root for us to lose, but I want us to be in a position to draft Luck.

:confused:

Here is the problem.. Assuming we win one more game this year and none of the 2 win teams currently win another game, we would draft 4th based on current Strength of Schedule. We have to pretty much lose out to ensure we get the #1 pick and are in the Luck sweepstakes. Buffalo has the highest Strength of Schedule, so they'd pick first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherFanOne Newbie

PantherFanOne

Posted
Posted

Here is the problem.. Assuming we win one more game this year and none of the 2 win teams currently win another game, we would draft 4th based on current Strength of Schedule. We have to pretty much lose out to ensure we get the #1 pick and are in the Luck sweepstakes. Buffalo has the highest Strength of Schedule, so they'd pick first.

I stand to be corrected but isn't it a game of opposites determining the draft picks?

In other words,the team with the weaker schedule would pick ahead of the team with the stronger schedule in case of a tie. Just asking.

Also,the Bengals beat us thereby giving us the tie breaker over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ElkinPanthersFan Rookie

ElkinPanthersFan

Posted
Posted

I stand to be corrected but isn't it a game of opposites determining the draft picks?

In other words,the team with the weaker schedule would pick ahead of the team with the stronger schedule in case of a tie. Just asking.

Also,the Bengals beat us thereby giving us the tie breaker over them.

Actually you are right.. I guess they believe if you cant beat crappy teams you deserve to get the pick. I'd think playing a harder schedule would get it. I guess we "Luck"ed out getting the NFC west this year lol.

The draft tiebreakers are as follows:

1) Super Bowl Winner picks 32nd

2) Super Bowl Loser picks 31st

3) Teams are ranked in inverse order of their record. Ties count as a half win and half loss.

4) A playoff team always picks after a non-playoff team with the same regular season record. If two playoff teams have the same regular season record, but one was eliminated in an earlier round, that team picks first.

5) Ties are then broken using strength of schedule (average of all 16 opponent's winning percentage, divisionmates count twice since they were played twice. Or count the wins of all opponents, same result). Weaker schedule picks earlier.

6) If SOS fails to break the tie, and the teams are in the same division, apply the division playoff tiebreakers (except the "loser" picks higher).

7) If SOS fails to break the tie, the teams are not in the same division, but the teams are in the same conference, apply the conference playoff tiebreakers (except the "loser" picks higher).

8) If the teams are still tied, or are in different conferences, a coin toss decides the order. If three teams are tied such that the tie can be broken as to two teams, but not between any of those two and a third team, the "loser" of the two-team tie flips against the other team first. A scenario where all three teams are stone tied is nearly impossible since there are only two conferences and intraconference tiebreakers go very deep before a coin flip.

http://www.east-coast-bias.com/2009/12/2010-nfl-draft-order-strength-of.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...