Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You’re on the clock


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Waldo said:

He is the best WR in the draft IMO. I also think you can get similar players in later rounds...

I also like Taylor over the other TEs and see him going like Olsen at the end of the first. Neither Warren or Loveland did any workouts because they only had value to lose. Taylor is going to be better and has obvious zip over the other two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

feels like last time panthers55 and I agreed on something was 2012 when we advocated for Luke.  100% certain that Warren must be the pick now! Overall the board didn't want Luke then either. 

Weren't you in on McCaffrey with me too? Maybe it was someone else.

With Canales being an offensive guy, there is always hope. With Warren and Sanders on either end we can run or pass from the same look and dominate either phase of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Weren't you in on McCaffrey with me too? Maybe it was someone else.

With Canales being an offensive guy, there is always hope. With Warren and Sanders on either end we can run or pass from the same look and dominate either phase of the game.

I wasn't CMC.  Only picks in all honesty I have called early and wanted and been right on of late are Cam, Luke and finally XL last year. 

I mean, I knew we were drafting Bryce, had Horn figured out, etc. going in but I wasn't championing those ahead of times as the picks I wanted. 

I have no confidence they take Warren but I want it to be the pick.   I'd prefer them take front 7 guys in rounds 2-4 and add a FA starter.  We get Brown back.  I don't think it will be a tough assignment to improve next year upfront vs last year on D.  Take Warren in round 1 and do something like Jordan Burch in round 2.  Then add some more talent up front in rounds 3 or 4.   Add a slot WR or 3rd down rec RB in the other.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

I also like Taylor over the other TEs and see him going like Olsen at the end of the first. Neither Warren or Loveland did any workouts because they only had value to lose. Taylor is going to be better and has obvious zip over the other two.

yeah Mason Taylor can also play in the slot as a WR so i agree he is going to have/has more zip & elusviness as a route runner than the other two

 

 

Edited by bandu
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Better throw Mason Graham and Walter Nolan in the mix. Maybe even McMillan and Membou in that group as will. They have interest in all of them

I think Graham is the only player I would turn down a trade down to take--but it depends on the trade.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

Malaki Starks might be BPA at #8

It might be a bit high, but would love to have him. Would give us fantastic safety starters, something Evero needs in his defense 

Edited by Martin
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny thing--we should have enough info to have a very open mind right now, but it sorta works the opposite direction.  With very limited knowledge, some of us are dug in and certain who the pick should be--I am more confused than ever--but that is how i roll.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Funny thing--we should have enough info to have a very open mind right now, but it sorta works the opposite direction.  With very limited knowledge, some of us are dug in and certain who the pick should be--I am more confused than ever--but that is how i roll.

This is a draft where 1 pick can throw everything anyone predicted out the window. I do not think the Panthers are locked in on one player. I think that is the same with every team. There's so many options available that you just take whatever is left among the discards that suits whatever you need. The talent on day 1 is really that even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I'd have to logout or start the biggest bitachfest in huddle history, followed by calling for new leadership.......then do it again tomorrow....

At least he fills a need and is a baller. We could do much worse. It is what it is. Yada Yada same old Panthers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...