Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person with the latest


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

I disagree. Tet is a much better prospect and a clear #1 potential. XL simply does not have the ball skills to be a 1.

In the same draft I would put XL below him but we drafted XL.   We need to be working on finding someone to knock AT out of the slot and bring YAC to Carolina.  Which isn’t Tet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

I disagree. Tet is a much better prospect and a clear #1 potential. XL simply does not have the ball skills to be a 1.

So what are we going to do? Trade Legette? Even if Legette is two, we don’t need another 6’4 go ball specialist. We had the Twin Towers experiment and experience, it didn’t end well. 
 

If anything, you would trade down and use the additional picks to trade back up to take Golden. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

So what are we going to do? Trade Legette? Even if Legette is two, we don’t need another 6’4 go ball specialist. We had the Twin Towers experiment and experience, it didn’t end well. 
 

If anything, you would trade down and use the additional picks to trade back up to take Golden. 

Well Morgan makes me look like an idiot. You had two tight ends who can do the exact same poo Tet can do sitting there, a true slot in Egbuka, a burner in Golden who can run the entire route tree. 
 

we take another go ball receiver to pair with the stiff hip Legette, stiff hip Sanders, and an aging Theilen and decent 3 option in what’s his face from Holy Cross. 
 

I don’t get it. I really don’t. This will inevitably fail like every other receiver draft pick not named Steve Smith. 
 

Idiots fell in love with the measurables yet again. I’d have been happier taking Shadeur Sanders than this guy who can’t even get off blocks in the PAC 12/Big 12. 
 

We have gone back in time to the Funchess/Benjamin experiment which was fantastic, when Benjamin got hurt. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CRA said:

yeah, this draft is going to suck.  Morgan and his folks are going to overprioritize defense.  Reach for their dudes early.  

I wouldn't be shocked if there first 5 rounds are 4 defensive players and a running back that doesn't actually make sense (hate their top 30 fixation there and who they looked at)  or some poo like that. 

Going into this draft, it's almost like we forgot we got the 30th ranked passing game in the NFL.   And our featured player, contemplated retirement, wasn't healthy and is going to be worse. 

Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Panthero said:

Lol

I'm not sure what happened there (CRA checks the modern day politician's playbook).  Oh, my account must of been hacked.  Hacked I tell you! 

None the less, my overall average of predicting what the Panthers will do.....remains unfazed.  I'm wrong 90% of the time about what this front office will do in a draft.  I nailed XL last year so I am due for a drought of about a decade lol. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

I think Coker ends up taking ATs spot.

I got nothing but love for Coker.  We still lack anyone that presents that quick YAC player.  I'll never get building a chunk play football team for Bryce  Young (who needs a dink and dunk team).  And yes, dink an dunks still go down field and chunk play still go short in games.  I just don't see the vision here.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CRA said:

I'm not sure what happened there (CRA checks the modern day politician's playbook).  Oh, my account must of been hacked.  Hacked I tell you! 

None the less, my overall average of predicting what the Panthers will do.....remains unfazed.  I'm wrong 90% of the time about what this front office will do in a draft.  I nailed XL last year so I am due for a drought of about a decade lol. 

 

Take note folks, this is how you respond. Humor. Well said and I have done at least worse if not far worse on predictions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Well Morgan makes me look like an idiot. You had two tight ends who can do the exact same poo Tet can do sitting there, a true slot in Egbuka, a burner in Golden who can run the entire route tree. 
 

we take another go ball receiver to pair with the stiff hip Legette, stiff hip Sanders, and an aging Theilen and decent 3 option in what’s his face from Holy Cross. 
 

I don’t get it. I really don’t. This will inevitably fail like every other receiver draft pick not named Steve Smith. 
 

Idiots fell in love with the measurables yet again. I’d have been happier taking Shadeur Sanders than this guy who can’t even get off blocks in the PAC 12/Big 12. 
 

We have gone back in time to the Funchess/Benjamin experiment which was fantastic, when Benjamin got hurt. 
 

I understand the skepticism, but I do think TMAC  is way above KB or Funchess ever were as prospects.  Neither of them even sniff TMAC in hands (felt like KB body caught nearly everything) agility and fluidity of movement, and route running.

 

No clue if it’ll work out but I get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...