Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shaq Thompson Remains a Free Agent


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, carpanfan96 said:

Don't think they would care, I'm pretty sure the plan is to start Jewell and Wallace with Rozebom the main backup. 

I agree, I think they have moved on.... unless jewel or Wallace get injured before the seasons start.. 

Sad for Shaq....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chknwing said:

we need LB help, hes actualy more than likely the best available considering he knows the team and play book

Just because we need LB help doesn't mean we need a feel good story. I truly don't think he adds value to the defense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Just because we need LB help doesn't mean we need a feel good story. I truly don't think he adds value to the defense 

He would add value, but it is short term value and takes away from the development of our younger players.

Wallace with reps may be better than Shaq in 2026, and it doesn't matter much if we aren't ready to compete and Shaq retires before we are.

We would be wasting our time with Shaq, even if we are better in the short term.  I hate being the voice of reason sometimes, because I am a fan of Shaq and his locker room presence.  Ship has sailed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're interested in developing our young guys like like 30 year old Jewell then you don't sign Shaq. If you're interested in putting the best team on the field, then you sign Shaq.

Rozeboom is shockingly bad and not much of an upgrade over Wooten or Cherelus.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, csx said:

I'd much rather see Wallace even if he didn't have an Achilles tear in late September  

There's a good reason he's a FA

 

TBH, without the Achilles tear there would be no comparison between Wallace and even this version of Shaq. Wallace was a so-so rookie and Shaq has been an extremely productive and capable veteran.

Now price however......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

TBH, without the Achilles tear there would be no comparison between Wallace and even this version of Shaq. Wallace was a so-so rookie and Shaq has been an extremely productive and capable veteran.

Now price however......

But Thompson isn't the future. You have to give your young players an opportunity. Especially when you aren't expected to make a run at anything 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, csx said:

But Thompson isn't the future. You have to give your young players an opportunity. Especially when you aren't expected to make a run at anything 

Well, I am not in the camp that thinks Wallace is the future either.

I ultimately would understand the decision even without the injury, if perhaps not completely agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, I love Shaq and have cheered for him since Day 1. I'd love to see him back but those injuries were all pretty major and they started coming one after another. That's usually the sign for a professional athlete that it's time to turn the page.

I think he's been an excellent linebacker throughout his career and when he took to the field beside Luke and TD, he was very much a man among equals there. I think that sadly, it is time for a new page for him, just like those other stalwarts. 

But please, ask him to come back and retire as a Panther. We'd be honored by him if he did.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...