Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ex-Panthers great Steve Smith sued under 'homewrecker law' for alleged affair.

jasonluckydog

By jasonluckydog,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Super Grateful Collaborator

Super Grateful

Posted
Posted

$100K is chump change to Smitty.

Marriage is stupid for reasons like this and excessive alimony. You sign a paper and all of the sudden you're trapped under all of these archaic laws that are designed to fug males.

I'll play devils advocate and say this, sex is the most addictive drug in the world and pussy can make men do things that most may not consider to be normal. these two obviously had some sort of sexual chemistry and she was obviously not happy in her marriage, and perhaps Smitty was bored in his now that the kids are grown and he's having a mid life crisis - he got caught slippin.

he'll pay this fine and that dude will live the rest of his life not feeling like he's enough. The chick will prob strike again or be ready to settle down, who knows or cares. Smitty will prob go through a hoe phase for the first time in a long while and then settle down with a young chick that he can ride into the sunset. 

everyone makes mistakes, everyone loses in this situation, life goes on, do what makes you happy. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Proficient

Montsta

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh good God

jayz-awkward.gif

Like bruh, getcha poo together. Once you leak texts between your wife and another man about how he was rearranging her IUD you absolutely cannot try to come crawling back. I'm suffering deep second hand embarrassment from even reading that poo. LOL

This is truth right here. My wife cheats on me and some crazy sex texts go public I’m gonna just sell my house take my half and try to quietly get the fug up on out of there as fast as my divorce lawyer will let me!

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jasonluckydog Grand Master

jasonluckydog

Posted
  • Author
Posted
45 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

 

I'll play devils advocate and say this, sex is the most addictive drug in the world and pussy can make men do things that most may not consider to be normal. these two obviously had some sort of sexual chemistry and she was obviously not happy in her marriage, and perhaps Smitty was bored in his now that the kids are grown and he's having a mid life crisis - he got caught slippin.

Yeah. Putang is a gateway drug. I'm JLD and I'm addicted to putang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MechaZain Grand Master

MechaZain

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Super Grateful said:

$100K is chump change to Smitty.

Marriage is stupid for reasons like this and excessive alimony. You sign a paper and all of the sudden you're trapped under all of these archaic laws that are designed to fug males.

I'll play devils advocate and say this, sex is the most addictive drug in the world and pussy can make men do things that most may not consider to be normal. these two obviously had some sort of sexual chemistry and she was obviously not happy in her marriage, and perhaps Smitty was bored in his now that the kids are grown and he's having a mid life crisis - he got caught slippin.

he'll pay this fine and that dude will live the rest of his life not feeling like he's enough. The chick will prob strike again or be ready to settle down, who knows or cares. Smitty will prob go through a hoe phase for the first time in a long while and then settle down with a young chick that he can ride into the sunset. 

everyone makes mistakes, everyone loses in this situation, life goes on, do what makes you happy. 

Yeah I've realized that marriage does more harm than good to a lot of relationships. You get so interwined that staying married becomes more important than being honest with your partner and yourself. There's more honesty and effort put in when both people are free to walk away whenever.

It's always been funny to me that "never stop dating your partner" is typical marriage counseling advice. I think the healthiest relationships you'll ever find are the unmarried couples who have been together for many years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jasonluckydog Grand Master

jasonluckydog

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I have been with my wife for 22 years. For 20 of those years, our relationship has been excellent, while the last 2 years have been just okay. The issue isn't with marriage itself; it's about finding the right partner. If you choose wisely, you can have a fulfilling life together. I feel fortunate to have made a good choice.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Your momma was a wise woman.

She was.  When I read his post, I was picturing in my head Sally Fields in Forest Gump--not to make any other connections, I just pictured a wise woman with unconditional love for her son.

I have been saying it for years--Smith is a POS as a human being.   A turd.  A self-absorbed, narcissitic, Napoleonic, punk.  He has good qualities, but they are not what defines him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Here is a question to ask if you are looking for ways to muddy the waters even further:  Does the Homewrecker Law apply to common law wives?  In NC, common law marriages were abolished in 1989, but in South Carolina, they are still recognized, but they have no alienation of affection laws.  However, one state--Utah, recognizes common law wives and alienation of affection.  That would be something--you are sued for having sex with a woman who has never been officially married.  I imagine that infidelity would nullify the common law marriage, but if the party who was faithful was not aware of the infidelity....

OK, back to sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MechaZain Grand Master

MechaZain

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Here is a question to ask if you are looking for ways to muddy the waters even further:  Does the Homewrecker Law apply to common law wives?  In NC, common law marriages were abolished in 1989, but in South Carolina, they are still recognized, but they have no alienation of affection laws.  However, one state--Utah, recognizes common law wives and alienation of affection.  That would be something--you are sued for having sex with a woman who has never been officially married.  I imagine that infidelity would nullify the common law marriage, but if the party who was faithful was not aware of the infidelity....

OK, back to sports.

Looks like in Utah common law marriage just means couples can be married retroactively if they apply for it. I'm with you though the alienation thing seems scammable. Fake marriage where the couple tries to extort the wealthy person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted

Even if you don't have squat you should still make a prenuptial. No one can get around all the laws but you can skip many of the BS laws out there trying to manage marriages. Settle up front and not when there is something to get greedy over. Being punished by a 3rd party is such BS but also take care and realize the prenuptial is basically a marriage contract where each state regulates differently and you will be at their mercy. Just my take.

I don't care about other people's personal business and this entire thing is a bit entertaining in all the wrong ways.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      OTA's

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

    • Jackie Lee
      OTA's

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

    • electro's horse
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By electro's horse · Posted

      I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...