Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ramsey

scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

therealmjl Grand Master

therealmjl

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

Yeah I disagree with Mike here.

Clowney, for instance, is a signing that would be akin (or even worse) than trading for Ramsey.

And Morgan has shown he doesn’t care about mid to late round picks given he just dumped them into an always injured 2nd round back last year.

 

So I’m not sure what Kaye is even talking about when he says it goes against everything Dan has done as GM.

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, therealmjl said:

Yeah I disagree with Mike here.

Clowney, for instance, is a signing that would be akin (or even worse) than trading for Ramsey.

And Morgan has shown he doesn’t care about mid to late round picks given he just dumped them into an always injured 2nd round back last year.

 

So I’m not sure what Kaye is even talking about when he says it goes against everything Dan has done as GM.

I'm honestly not sure which way I see it going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, therealmjl said:

Yeah I disagree with Mike here.

Clowney, for instance, is a signing that would be akin (or even worse) than trading for Ramsey.

And Morgan has shown he doesn’t care about mid to late round picks given he just dumped them into an always injured 2nd round back last year.

 

So I’m not sure what Kaye is even talking about when he says it goes against everything Dan has done as GM.

2-3 years of Ramsey is a lot better than you'll get out of most 4th round picks.  I think it makes sense if they have room for his tremendous cap hit, because the guaranteed money is already paid out.  Pretty low risk high reward move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
On 6/4/2025 at 8:24 PM, thunderraiden said:

Guy? Thats Vashi with Carolina Blitz a woman.

and shes a reporter with real connections to the team

wasn't her because I follow her too. lol relax 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlazeCarolina Experienced

BlazeCarolina

Posted
Posted
On 6/6/2025 at 9:13 AM, therealmjl said:

And Morgan has shown he doesn’t care about mid to late round picks given he just dumped them into an always injured 2nd round back last year.

I feel like this is a crazy take.  Obviously the plan wasn't for Brooks to get injured again.

You really believe Dan doesn't care about 2nd round picks?  He was taking a risk, hoping it would pay off big.  Brooks was the first running back off the board.  They obviously saw a ton of potential there.  Life happens sometimes.

You can't view things in hindsight and act like you knew them ahead of time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ornias Grand Master

Ornias

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BlazeCarolina said:

I feel like this is a crazy take.  Obviously the plan wasn't for Brooks to get injured again.

You really believe Dan doesn't care about 2nd round picks?  He was taking a risk, hoping it would pay off big.  Brooks was the first running back off the board.  They obviously saw a ton of potential there.  Life happens sometimes.

You can't view things in hindsight and act like you knew them ahead of time.

We did not have the luxury of rolling the dice though. Most of the board wanted the center (Frazier) that made the all rookie team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlazeCarolina Experienced

BlazeCarolina

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Ornias said:

We did not have the luxury of rolling the dice though. Most of the board wanted the center (Frazier) that made the all rookie team. 

That is a different discussion, though.

I don't disagree, but I think they are trying to get back to our former identity and become a tough, hard nosed, run first team.  If that is the case, the pick makes a lot more sense.  We were deadly with a one-two punch as much as I dislike D-Will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BlazeCarolina said:

That is a different discussion, though.

I don't disagree, but I think they are trying to get back to our former identity and become a tough, hard nosed, run first team.  If that is the case, the pick makes a lot more sense.  We were deadly with a one-two punch as much as I dislike D-Will.

We were? We had two winning seasons out of DeAngelo's eight with the team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlazeCarolina Experienced

BlazeCarolina

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We were? We had two winning seasons out of DeAngelo's eight with the team.

Times have been dark buddy.  We haven't had a winning season in 8 years.  2 out of 8 sounds like an improvement.

Nostalgia may be clouding my perception a bit, but let's not act like we have our poo together lol

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BlazeCarolina said:

I feel like this is a crazy take.  Obviously the plan wasn't for Brooks to get injured again.

You really believe Dan doesn't care about 2nd round picks?  He was taking a risk, hoping it would pay off big.  Brooks was the first running back off the board.  They obviously saw a ton of potential there.  Life happens sometimes.

You can't view things in hindsight and act like you knew them ahead of time.

lol thank you. Everyone’s a genius after the fact 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, BlazeCarolina said:

Times have been dark buddy.  We haven't had a winning season in 8 years.  2 out of 8 sounds like an improvement.

Nostalgia may be clouding my perception a bit, but let's not act like we have our poo together lol

We definitely don't. I'm just saying that we didn't when we were concentrating tons of resources into RBs either.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlazeCarolina Experienced

BlazeCarolina

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We definitely don't. I'm just saying that we didn't when we were concentrating tons of resources into RBs either.

I feel like we had more issues back then, though.  Whether you like the regime or the plan, they do seem to have a plan.  Revamping the team group by group and building something.  I am admittedly overly optimistic when it comes to the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, BlazeCarolina said:

I feel like we had more issues back then, though.  Whether you like the regime or the plan, they do seem to have a plan.  Revamping the team group by group and building something.  I am admittedly overly optimistic when it comes to the Panthers.

We have a lot of issues. We're just hoping that we may have some of them fixed. We still got a see it play out on the field first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlazeCarolina Experienced

BlazeCarolina

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We have a lot of issues. We're just hoping that we may have some of them fixed. We still got a see it play out on the field first.

I'd say they did a good job fixing the o-line.  Our running back room on paper looks good to me.  WR group is the most exciting we have had in a long while.  Thielen said it was the first time since he has been here that he doesn't know who will make the roster and that the floor is raised.  Our defense looks very different than last year with a clear focus on stopping the run which was a huge weakness.  They can only do so much at once.  I think we have plenty to be excited and hopeful about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mav1234
      PFF Best Rookies so far: Two Panthers

      By mav1234 · Posted

      Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • mav1234
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion in Here)

      By mav1234 · Posted

      At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • amcoolio
      Trade deadline

      By amcoolio · Posted

      Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...