Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN poised to buy NFL Network, RedZone


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'll stick to the bootlegs at home, pain in the ass to try and play anything aside from local games at bars though. Even then they have the bullshit Netflix Christmas games, and the random peacock playoff game, which both glitch out over roku or whatever so then all the customers are pissed lol. Plus two different tv's streaming the same game will go out of sync within 10 minutes even if you try to pause/ff one to catch up with the other where a couple cable boxes are always in sync. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I'll stick to the bootlegs at home, pain in the ass to try and play anything aside from local games at bars though. Even then they have the bullshit Netflix Christmas games, and the random peacock playoff game, which both glitch out over roku or whatever so then all the customers are pissed lol. Plus two different tv's streaming the same game will go out of sync within 10 minutes even if you try to pause/ff one to catch up with the other where a couple cable boxes are always in sync. 

Sunday Ticket is still available for retail establishments
And good sports bars should be using a master control video panel to feed a single input out to various TVs rather than having individual tuners/streaming boxes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is ridiculous, Redzone I wouldn't have cared much about, because that's just the games on Sundays.

But NFL Network makes no sense, the best thing about it is that it's different than ESPN, which I haven't watched a single thing on it besides live sports for close to 10 years now, even the NFL draft I stick to the NFL Network coverage.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deal expected to be announced on Wednesday

ESPN is expected to have access to RedZone, NFL Network, seven more regular-season games, the NFL’s fantasy football business, as well as the potential to integrate special features (including betting) and potentially more assets. The agreement coincides with ESPN’s forthcoming direct-to-consumer service that will formally launch in the next few weeks."

The NFL may receive up to 10 percent of ESPN equity, sources confirmed

In the ESPN family of networks, NFL Network could be looked upon similarly to the SEC Network. The SEC offers programming 24/7 about the league, while ESPN, the main channel, dedicates significant airtime to it as well. The same sort of setup, with on-air personalities being used across brands, is very possible.



https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6530655/2025/08/01/nfl-espn-media-deal-tv-broadcast/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

A Pirates Expert Reviewed Pirates Of The Caribbean, And She Has Some Major  Thoughts About Johnny Depp's Captain Jack Sparrow

The less than legit streams usually suck though.  At least in my experience.  I'll pay to have solid quality HD streaming to my big ass TV.  But I have my limits.

At this point, I'd honestly quit watching before I hooked up my laptop to the TV and watched it in 480p or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...