Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I'd be down.  Would suck not getting a stud lb in the first but so be it. Sellers has the it factor 

He can’t hit an 8 yard slant and he has the football IQ of a doorknob. But sure, draft the guy. We’d be drafting another QB in 3 years after Sellers flames out. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, chbright said:

Neither party wants that. Even if Shane was good, it's doomed at VT. He would have to win the CFP as validation to most fans of being nothing more than Frank's kid getting something he didn't earn. Others would see.no wrong cause he's a Beamer. So no, hell no to Shane. Plus SEC has deeper NIL pockets, why would Shane want to go to VT? Cause unless it's a true blank check that, there is no upside for him.

IF he's fired, I think he looks elsewhere anyways than VT cause Shane wants to be known for what he does and not Frank's kid.

I figured, maybe in error, they would want him there and he may need to be wanted by someone pretty soon.
He sure doesn’t want to know how I feel about him right now.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

He can’t hit an 8 yard slant and he has the football IQ of a doorknob. But sure, draft the guy. We’d be drafting another QB in 3 years after Sellers flames out. 

Wouldn't take three years because if he comes out he's not going in the 1st. He needs to go to a QB whisperer. He needs to be Lincoln Riley to take him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Wouldn't take three years because if he comes out he's not going in the 1st. He needs to go to a QB whisperer. He needs to be Lincoln Riley to take him.

Makes the most sense for him to stay and transfer.  Both from development and money standpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

People are talking top 5 pick but i’d take him at 10 or wherever we end up , has a Brock Purdy kinda vibe

If he's there with a Brock Purdy type pick I'd take him. I'm not spending a first round pick on the guy though. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The word I feel most comfortable using as a descriptor is "inconsistent". Haven't really seen anyone disagree with that. Consistency being one of the things I value most in a player, that makes me lean toward moving on. But he does still have both time and opportunity to prove otherwise. Mind you, having a streaky quarterback isn't exactly a new thing in Charlotte (you could argue it's been the norm). Delhomme was notorious for starting slow but finishing strong. He could sadly also find hos way into ruts that were difficult to crawl out of. Newton, on the other hand, was often known to start hot but fade late (the vast majority of the 2015 season followed that pattern) though it could be argued that was a team pattern as much as it was Cam's.  There are definitely some fans for whom this is always going to be a bridge too far. (or too short) Realistically, it's not impossible that he could still have a good career even with those issues. It's a damn sight more difficult, though. And arguably, less likely.
    • Oh, I did, and they weren't based in emotions either. Granted, characterizing them that way gives you an easy out to avoid responding to them. Similar tactic to dismissing the other guy's points with "nah, you didn't really watch the games" which saves you having to debate what he said. Strikes me as a kinda lazy way to go, but hey both elements are still back there if you feel up to trying later.
    • I see the issue, I am not counting his rookie season where he didn't actually play minus a few snaps of garbage time. So by your math that would be his 4th year.
×
×
  • Create New...