Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Preseason Panthers v Texans official game day thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Joe Bear said:

The T-Mac one wasn't a drop at all, but the Sanders one was absolutely on Sanders.

Sanders was 100% a drop.  But I still think the fact this team has no YAC is in part ball placement by BY often.   BY should be that in front of him not on him.   TMac was an off target ball (which BY ran a super high % last year doing) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

Oh no…I’m not able to watch, I’ve just been lurking on here. 

We basically hadn't done anything until Jack Plummer came in and the backups started to trickle out onto the field from the Texans.  The literal highlight from the starters, if you can even call it that, was Sanders dropping a dime that hit him in the hands for a first down.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

Sanders was 100% a drop.  But I still think the fact this team has no YAC is in part ball placement by BY often.   BY should be that in front of him not on him.   TMac was an off target ball (which BY ran a super high % last year doing) 

Sometimes it's because of the QB and sometimes it's because the receiver isn't getting separation and even an in-stride throw comes replete with an immediate hip tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If the top qbs keep progressing as they should there should be quite of few good prospects this year.  

Yeah, I won't be surprising at all if Arch wouldn't even go #1 next year. A lot of people are putting a lot of stock into a last name and a tiny sample size of plays. MUCH more than former than the latter. If his last name was Smith he'd just be that guy who was a #1 overall QB recruit a few years ago who has been riding the pine behind a fringe NFL QB prospect for some reason.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, I won't be surprising at all if Arch wouldn't even go #1 next year. A lot of people are putting a lot of stock into a last name and a tiny sample size of plays. MUCH more than former than the latter. If his last name was Smith he'd just be that guy who was a #1 overall QB recruit a few years ago who has been riding the pine behind a fringe NFL QB prospect for some reason.

The Lsu kid is a goddamn gunslinger that would be fun but Sellers, holy fug, I get he needs seasoning and accuracy but man that kid was built in a lab.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...