Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

TBH, I am not completely convinced they actually want to trade him. It's either that or they are gonna overplay their hand and it isn't going to work.

You gotta consider that if people REALLY want him, he is close to being a free agent so that you just have to shell out $$$ versus money, a 1st and a player.

 

Remember this is one of three teams that were all-in on Deshaun Watson.  The Falcons bailed because the money got to high.  Tepper bailed because the contract had to be guaranteed in full. Only the Browns were dumb enough to agree to that.  Had the Browns bailed, Watson would be a Panther.

Don't underestimate this team on shying away from absurdly laughable deals.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Remember this is one of three teams that were all-in on Deshaun Watson.  The Falcons bailed because the money got to high.  Tepper bailed because the contract had to be guaranteed in full. Only the Browns were dumb enough to agree to that.  Had the Browns bailed, Watson would be a Panther.

Don't underestimate this team on shying away from absurdly laughable deals.

We're only the 31st dumbest team in the league!!! When and where is the parade?

whoooo-south-park.gif

 

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am failing to understand why we have a portion of the people in this thread so gung ho about this trade.

Can you please logically explain why we should trade the asking price(or anywhere near, for that matter) and what benefit you hope to accomplish?

The downsides seem to be clear(as have been stated by so many).

Contract Price: Likely north of $30 mil AAV and 3+ years.

Age: Will be 31 by the end of the season

Draft Capital: With a roster bereft of proven talent, why give away a 4-5 year cheap and possibly high end future player?

Player Compensation: What young defensive player do you plan on giving up? Horn and Brown are not a 1:1 trade plus the cap ramifications would be bad. What other young defensive players even have real trade value?

Overall Net Benefit: This team is lacking in talent at a franchise historic level. Wins and playoff contention do not seem to be relatively close. So what is the benefit of adding an aging, expensive,  elite pass rusher to a team in which so much more is needed to be a true competitor? When do you expect that to translate to winning seasons?

Really, someone from the pro-trade camp, just give me a logical case as to why this would be a sound idea.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

sure or any one of the other top picks if bryce cannot get it done.  You got to keep swinging for a qb

Bingo. Doesn't matter if it's a Manning, Brady or the reincarnation of Joe Namath in pantyhose. We've got to have a starting caliber NFL QB and if Bryce ain't the guy, we will be in the best position to find one by keeping out 1st round picks. For every Dak, Wilson and Brady there's a Weinke, Grier and Corral. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

The Saints will tank a season or two, if needed, for Arch.  Apparently they want to bring back a Manning really bad.

I don't think the discussions they had with their new coach included "fug it, tank for Arch for however long is necessary" plans. 

I also think people are jumping to assumptions on where he will end up AND when he will leave. 

Don't be shocked to see him play his entire college career out or stay in school to duck a bad franchise(including the Saints, BTW).

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think the discussions they had with their new coach included "fug it, tank for Arch for however long is necessary" plans. 

I also think people are jumping to assumptions on where he will end up AND when he will leave. 

Don't be shocked to see him play his entire college career out or stay in school to duck a bad franchise(including the Saints, BTW).

Archie has already said he won't be entering the draft next year. They want him playing four years of college ball like he did and like Eli and Peyton did and I mean, I can't argue against it. I'm definitely not going to argue with the Manning family about how to best prepare a young QB for the NFL. Their formula for themselves sure has worked so far.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Because at 30 (he'll turn 31 on December 5th) he's likely to be past his prime before this team is ready to meaningfully compete all the while it's draining us of cap space and depriving us of draft capital to add younger talent. It's just not a smart move for this organization at this time, but it's the exact type of move we've been making the entire Tepper era where we're more than happy to shoot ourselves in the dick for the future while trying to squeeze 5-6 wins out of a 3-4 win roster. Just brilliant.

🤨

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think the discussions they had with their new coach included "fug it, tank for Arch for however long is necessary" plans. 

I also think people are jumping to assumptions on where he will end up AND when he will leave. 

Don't be shocked to see him play his entire college career out or stay in school to duck a bad franchise(including the Saints, BTW).

They have a cap debt to deal with.  Tanking won't be hard to mask in the name of getting their financial house in order.  They are 30th next year in cap room and a dumpster fire.  If they want to get that under control, FA is an afterthought.  Why do you think their QB room looks like it does now?  No desire to upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...