Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Y'all still chomping at the bit? LOL

Screenshot_20250818-200540.thumb.png.0a4ae24deed6472bb4f42d75b7151551.png

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/cincinnati-bengals/news/trey-hendrickson-trade-packages-commanders-lions-bengals-edge-rusher/04c5da5188af6ce49110eee1?utm_term=trey hendrickson,cincinnati bengals,detroit lions,nfl,washington commanders&utm_medium=browser_notifications&utm_source=pushly&utm_content=US&utm_campaign=Trey Hendrickson trade packages 👀

First rounder is untouchable, could be Arch.

Edited by Shocker
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Archie has already said Arch won't be declaring for the draft next year. And if they blocked Eli to the Chargers ain't no way they're letting Arch end up in this poo show. LOL

Things can change but I do expect him to stay another year if not 2.  Doesn’t matter we can’t trade firsts that never works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ClawOn Grand Master

ClawOn

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think the GM matters on these big deals. They're going through the big guy.

I think the GM matters now. Morgan hasn't been perfect but the evidence so far is that he is making long term moves. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Shocker said:

Things can change but I do expect him to stay another year if not 2.  Doesn’t matter we can’t trade firsts that never works out.

Seems like their stance is that Archie, Peyton, and Eli all played 4 years of college ball and if it ain't broke don't try to fix it. I mean, I can't really argue with the Mannings on how to best prepare for the NFL as a QB. But yeah, I definitely think that if they stood form and forced a block of Eli to the Chargers they'd probably due the same for Tepper's Panthers.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, ClawOn said:

I think the GM matters now. Morgan hasn't been perfect but the evidence so far is that he is making long term moves. 

I'm not saying it doesn't matter, but on the huge moves I absolutely think Tepper is directly involved. I don't think you're trading future 1st rounders without him being involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Seems like their stance is that Archie, Peyton, and Eli all played 4 years of college ball and if it ain't broke don't try to fix it. I mean, I can't really argue with the Mannings on how to best prepare for the NFL as a QB. But yeah, I definitely think that if they stood form and forced a block of Eli to the Chargers they'd probably due the same for Tepper's Panthers.

True, but that pick would be gold.  The picks we could get would be nice…another player will rise

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

I still don’t get it… we’re supposed to trade away a first and multiple defensive starters for a 4-3 DE to play OLB in our defense?  

Oh and he’s over 30 and needs a new contract and struggles to stop the run?

It's Panthers logic. No one get it. LOL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ClawOn Grand Master

ClawOn

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not saying it doesn't matter, but on the huge moves I absolutely think Tepper is directly involved. I don't think you're trading future 1st rounders without him being involved.

Irrelevant in this discussion then.   Morgan isn't trading 1st rounders for Hendrickson.  Off the top of my head his trades have been:

Burns for a 2nd, a shuffle with D Jackson and Johnson that didn't work or hurt, 7th round Barrett for Michael Jackson (wow) and a 4th for Mingo (uh, yeah).

I don't follow why anyone would discern from that track record that he'd ship a single first for Hendrickson. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PantherChris
      NHL Olympics Thread (Or just Olympics in general)

      By PantherChris · Posted

      They also didn't mind it last year during four nations, or when they beat the fins lol. Sour grapes, they had 3 pf the top four players in the world on the ice when we beat them.
    • rebelrouser
      Mike Kaye: LB Devin Lloyd could be a realistic possibility

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      The tag for '26 is 28M. No way they tag him.  He is projected to be worth around 60M for 3 years so they could still try to sign him on an extension for about that amount: JagsWire   As someone else mentioned, the tag average factors in outside linebackers, aka, edge rushers, in the line backer formula.  If they would distinguish between olb and ilb, the ilb would get a lot less. 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      He didn't actually make the playoffs. We had several opportunities to clinch on our own and crapped the bed. We had to wait for Atlanta to win to get us in. We had the tie breaker in a poo division that had 3 teams finish 8-9.  If you go back and look at the games we played, we weren't a dominant offensive team under him as an OC. We beat the Jets 13-7 and barely beat the packers after they failed to convert multiple red zone trips. We relied heavily on converting 4th downs. DC was also extremely slow at recognizing trends in game and was really lacking with clock management.  Was there progress this year? Yes. But most of it was on the defensive side of the ball. Our offense was stagnant with a couple of exceptions. Any improvement from Bryce was minimal and he kept insisting on XL over Coker, and even RB distribution instead of going with the hot hand.  He may be building something, but I don't think we've seen enough to know what that is. It could go either direction. If he insists on being OC, then without a noticeable improvement, yes he needs to be on the hot seat like any OC would. The more jobs you take on the more you have to be judged on. I think he would have a longer leash if he hired a true OC and just focused in being HC.   
×
×
  • Create New...