Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers possibly trading Thielen?


philit99
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Horn was out on the field as they ran the clock out last night.  That tells you about Horn Jr. 

if they trade AT….its because Coker and Renfrow can do what AT does 

I think that means he's a lock to make the team but they know he'll be 5th or worse on the depth chart, so they wanted to get him as many snaps as possible before he ends up getting minimal snaps in the regular season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Says more about Horn Jr then it does about Renfrow. 

I actually expect them to split time at slot with Horn taking more time away as the season goes on. 

I don't think Horn gets much playing time at all unless injuries happen. I think Coker gets first crack at slot WR with Tet and XL starting out wide.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, I honestly don't see Horn making the roster unless moving AT frees up a spot for him. 

Nah, because if they weren't planning on keeping Horn, he likely wouldn't have played at all, hoping they could then sneak him through to the PS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

I don't think Horn gets much playing time at all unless injuries happen. I think Coker gets first crack at slot WR with Tet and XL starting out wide.

I agree. I see all the talk of Renfrow but it has been Coker that has earned the PT all offseason long.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I agree. I see all the talk of Renfrow but it has been Coker that has earned the PT all offseason long.

I think he has a decent chance of not making the 53. He'd be no higher than 5th on the WR depth chart and didn't do anything to show out on special teams. I would prefer those bottom of the roster types to be special teams contributors.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ProcessBlue2 said:

Well apparently Dave Canales read this and agreed with me.

 

IMG_4654.jpeg

Well, sounds like Thielen is as good as gone. I wouldn't expect a coach to even entertain talking about trading a player in the days leading up to week one kicking off unless it was happening. Those types of questions are usually just flat out shot down by coaches.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not opposed to it IF we're confident XL is ready to deliver AND that Renfrow can stay healthy. I didn't like how he reached for that hammy after that hospital ball last night.

I would add IF we get a good offer.

Theilen would need to be agreeable to the idea, of course.

(not certain that's true)

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Well, sounds like Thielen is as good as gone. I wouldn't expect a coach to even entertain talking about trading a player in the days leading up to week one kicking off unless it was happening. Those types of questions are usually just flat out shot down by coaches.

Anything that coms from David Newton requires context.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think he has a decent chance of not making the 53. He'd be no higher than 5th on the WR depth chart and didn't do anything to show out on special teams. I would prefer those bottom of the roster types to be special teams contributors.

Wouldn't be surprised if Renfrow is left off, but I do think he is the 2nd best option in the slot behind Coker when AT is traded (assuming we don't use Tet in the slot). The more I think, the more I start believing Horn is the odd man out and somebody we hope to stash on PS. Hopefully I am wrong though and Moore is the one we cut.

Tet-XL-Cokehead-Renfrow-Tremayne-Moore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Well apparently Dave Canales read this and agreed with me.

 

IMG_4654.jpeg

Playing the same role is different than having the same style.  Cam Newton and Drew Brees both played QB but arent the same type in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I just dont get the worry over losing a practice squad player that just went undrafted. Everyone just made their selections. The chances of a team wanting to sign him to an active roster after not selecting him is very low.  If that interested they would have taken him late to evaluate in person. As far as I can tell two qbs were signed off another teams practice squad last season and they were both going in to their 5th season.
    • I enjoyed reading this thread and the usual banter that follows. The only silver lining I can identify right now is we do actually have a couple of young QB's behind him and we do have a nice roster on both sides of the ball built around the most important position. So if the team overall shows some promise but we still falter largely due to a lack of consistent passing output (again) hopefully the decision makers can be free to make the best decision for the team going forward after the conclusion of this upcoming season.
    • I don't really follow the team anymore due to a variety of reasons and consequently have largely stopped posting but I agree that this is a lovely website and community. This forum probably kept me around for years longer than I would've stuck otherwise because of how difficult it was to stop checking multiple times a day. Especially appreciate how lax the moderation tends to be compared to a lot of places, the crew here does a great job. Out of curiousity I decided to try making a new account (solely for testing purposes) to see what exactly is wrong with the sign up process. The issue seems to be that it never sends you an account verification email, thus making it impossible to complete registration. This is likely something to do with the email server upstream, hope it gets fixed. Also, lol
×
×
  • Create New...