Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everything revolves around Bryce This Year

Panthers Fan 69

By Panthers Fan 69,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Shotgun Grand Master

Shotgun

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

This has been the story since he was drafted. 

With how bad the D looks again it could end up being everything is just bad and the fault will start at Tepper and roll down hill from there.

I expect big changes next year if we don’t have a winning season. GM, HC, DC, and QB. Some or all will need to be replaced if things don’t go well.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

I expect big changes next year if we don’t have a winning season. GM, HC, DC, and QB. Some or all will need to be replaced if things don’t go well.

Sir, the Panthers are not going to have a winning season this year. They're too young/inexperienced at the skill positions. I'd say 2026 is the season for winning expectations. This year is for development. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bandu Mentor

bandu

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Waldo said:

This has been the story since he was drafted. 

With how bad the D looks again it could end up being everything is just bad and the fault will start at Tepper and roll down hill from there.

it's a result of some ultra rich ego maniac that buys an NFL franchise & does not really understand ir let's say know poo about professional football & all at the same time thinks he knows everything 

that's why every season you see much of the same thing constantly repeating itself ...just saying 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Shotgun said:

I expect big changes next year if we don’t have a winning season. GM, HC, DC, and QB. Some or all will need to be replaced if things don’t go well.

I agree. I just don't see Evero as being a scapegoat after they brought him back this year. If Young doesn't play well they have Dalton to lean on which should also fall on them. 

Rhule proved that a year 3 should be earned or it shouldn't happen. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I agree. I just don't see Evero as being a scapegoat after they brought him back this year. If Young doesn't play well they have Dalton to lean on which should also fall on them. 

Rhule proved that a year 3 should be earned or it shouldn't happen. 

Who would he get to come in at GM? Remember, he hired a firm to hire the best candidate which just so happened to be the only candidate mentioned. Pepper has been rejected by multiple coaches and I'd assume multiple GMs if we follow the coaches pattern. Could we see Marty Hurney 3.0?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Who would he get to come in at GM? Remember, he hired a firm to hire the best candidate which just so happened to be the only candidate mentioned. Pepper has been rejected by multiple coaches and I'd assume multiple GMs if we follow the coaches pattern. Could we see Marty Hurney 3.0?

They hired consultants and then just ended up with the gut his wife really liked lol.

It's a fair question. Maybe just let the consultants do the hiring instead of being 1/3 of the vote? So far his people have been asswater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shotgun Grand Master

Shotgun

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Sir, the Panthers are not going to have a winning season this year. They're too young/inexperienced at the skill positions. I'd say 2026 is the season for winning expectations. This year is for development. 

I agree, I think we will have 3-4 wins. To me, that means some people should lose their jobs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrewerHouseBeer Collaborator

BrewerHouseBeer

Posted
Posted

Morgan and Canales should get a chance to draft their own QB. I just hope this franchise is ready to make a difficult decision on Bryce if he has a mediocre season. I worry If we win 6-8 games but Bryce looks like a low to mid QB, we will call it improvement and extend him. I would hope we move on from him and try something new, if he's not a top 10 QB this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shotgun Grand Master

Shotgun

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Hopefully not that bad, but we'll know by week 4.

I just don't see how we're going to win games. The O is gonna have to put up 28+ points a game to win  and we look like a team that will struggle to score more than 14.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, BrewerHouseBeer said:

Morgan and Canales should get a chance to draft their own QB. I just hope this franchise is ready to make a difficult decision on Bryce if he has a mediocre season. I worry If we win 6-8 games but Bryce looks like a low to mid QB, we will call it improvement and extend him. I would hope we move on from him and try something new, if he's not a top 10 QB this season. 

Morgan was part of the Bryce Young brain trust. 

and Bryce Young was setup on a tee to be traded out of here after 2 games into the season last year. 

Dan Morgan especially shouldn't get extended time.   I can handle Canales getting a QB that matches what he does.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DamnItJake!
      EVERYONE UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS IN YOUR PROFILE

      By DamnItJake! · Posted

      The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • KillerKat
       Carolina Hurricanes vs.Vegas Golden Knights  (Stanley Cup Final Game 1) | ESPN on ABC Tuesday, June 2 | 8:00 PM

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...