Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce by the numbers(emotionless post)


KaseKlosed
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, MRenshaw said:

PFF can go jump off a cliff and die. Did they even watch the game tape? How is possible that they ranked Bryce higher than Trevor Lawrence, unless they're pushing an agenda paid for by Alabama bagmen?

I mean let’s not act like Lawrence was any good, he was pretty bad also. Jags just got a few turnovers off a bad Panthers O and a 71 yard run and that was the difference. At least we aren’t paying Bryce a ton of money like the Jags are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

exactly, this is on the level of David Carr.....yet unlike parting w/ David Carr after a year we are entering year 3.   We are basically the David Carr Houston Texans right now.  Rationalizing how it is really everyone else making Carr/Bryce bad. 

People still do that with Carr to this day.  Oh no he's gonna get "David Carr'd".  Nah maybe Carr just sucked man.  

The-Big-Lebowski_resize.jpg

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

I mean let’s not act like Lawrence was any good, he was pretty bad also. Jags just got a few turnovers off a bad Panthers O and a 71 yard run and that was the difference. At least we aren’t paying Bryce a ton of money like the Jags are

I mean that is certainly one way of looking at things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

I mean let’s not act like Lawrence was any good, he was pretty bad also. Jags just got a few turnovers off a bad Panthers O and a 71 yard run and that was the difference. At least we aren’t paying Bryce a ton of money like the Jags are

Lawrence was basically mediocre. He didn't do much to win a game but very importantly in this one he didn't do anything to lose the game which is what Bryce was busy doing on the other side of the ball.

Don't forget that this game probably should've been 33-3 because we got bailed out of a pick six by an iffy call on the opposite side of the field and then scored a TD on the very next play. That was a 14 point swing right there 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

I mean let’s not act like Lawrence was any good, he was pretty bad also. Jags just got a few turnovers off a bad Panthers O and a 71 yard run and that was the difference. At least we aren’t paying Bryce a ton of money like the Jags are

Lawrence was average, but Bryce was far below average. This isn't even up for debate, yet the Alabama-fellating cross-dressers at PFF apparently disagrees. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Did you just say analytics are horse poo and then give me some analytics?

No I told you analytics are horseshit  and gave you the reason why that stats misleading. 

Edited by RJK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

People still do that with Carr to this day.  Oh no he's gonna get "David Carr'd".  Nah maybe Carr just sucked man.  

The-Big-Lebowski_resize.jpg

Once Carr left, things suddenly weren’t as bad.   The losing seasons went away starting the first year.  And they didn’t bring in Lamar Jackson, it was just an okay Matt Schuab

but yeah, logically we are the Carr Texans at this point.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, RJK said:

Nah. Analytics are horseshit. Of course his completion % is high. 3/4 of his passes are behind or at the LOS 

His completion % wasn’t even high.  Think OP misstated a stat.  Bryce was 30th this week in completion %.  The bottom is where he has been every year in the NFL in that department.  

you gotta dig real deep in analytics to make a Bryce argument 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/nutshellsportz.bsky.social/post/3mo3rkrcezs2e  A look at Run Threat Rate across the NFL Run Threat Rate is the percentage of plays where a team either runs the ball or uses play action. This compares each team’s rate when leading or tied versus when trailing to show how much they abandon the run when playing from behind.
    • That's the current dilemma on both parties at the moment. If Ickey comes back too soon, he won't be 100% and his play will suffer. Leading to a potential decrease in his contract. If Ickey is unable to play and sits the entire 2026 season, his contract will still take the same hit since it tells all 32 team that he is not fully recovered. On the Panthers side, I'm sure they would want to keep Ickey if he is fully recovered but he is obviously in a contract year. They don't want to re-sign him to a massive deal since it be too risky and they know if Ickey is able to return to form.  Best case scenario, the Panthers wants to offer Ickey a 1-2 year heavily incentive based prove it deal. However, Ickey would most likely decline the offer and test the market as  another team can come in and offer Ickey a better deal if they are desperate enough for O-line help.
    • They have been giving him a lot of snaps at RT to give TMo some relief in camp. I think that will continue for the time being.
×
×
  • Create New...