Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce by the numbers(emotionless post)


KaseKlosed
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, MRenshaw said:

PFF can go jump off a cliff and die. Did they even watch the game tape? How is possible that they ranked Bryce higher than Trevor Lawrence, unless they're pushing an agenda paid for by Alabama bagmen?

I mean let’s not act like Lawrence was any good, he was pretty bad also. Jags just got a few turnovers off a bad Panthers O and a 71 yard run and that was the difference. At least we aren’t paying Bryce a ton of money like the Jags are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

exactly, this is on the level of David Carr.....yet unlike parting w/ David Carr after a year we are entering year 3.   We are basically the David Carr Houston Texans right now.  Rationalizing how it is really everyone else making Carr/Bryce bad. 

People still do that with Carr to this day.  Oh no he's gonna get "David Carr'd".  Nah maybe Carr just sucked man.  

The-Big-Lebowski_resize.jpg

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

I mean let’s not act like Lawrence was any good, he was pretty bad also. Jags just got a few turnovers off a bad Panthers O and a 71 yard run and that was the difference. At least we aren’t paying Bryce a ton of money like the Jags are

I mean that is certainly one way of looking at things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

I mean let’s not act like Lawrence was any good, he was pretty bad also. Jags just got a few turnovers off a bad Panthers O and a 71 yard run and that was the difference. At least we aren’t paying Bryce a ton of money like the Jags are

Lawrence was basically mediocre. He didn't do much to win a game but very importantly in this one he didn't do anything to lose the game which is what Bryce was busy doing on the other side of the ball.

Don't forget that this game probably should've been 33-3 because we got bailed out of a pick six by an iffy call on the opposite side of the field and then scored a TD on the very next play. That was a 14 point swing right there 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

I mean let’s not act like Lawrence was any good, he was pretty bad also. Jags just got a few turnovers off a bad Panthers O and a 71 yard run and that was the difference. At least we aren’t paying Bryce a ton of money like the Jags are

Lawrence was average, but Bryce was far below average. This isn't even up for debate, yet the Alabama-fellating cross-dressers at PFF apparently disagrees. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Did you just say analytics are horse poo and then give me some analytics?

No I told you analytics are horseshit  and gave you the reason why that stats misleading. 

Edited by RJK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

People still do that with Carr to this day.  Oh no he's gonna get "David Carr'd".  Nah maybe Carr just sucked man.  

The-Big-Lebowski_resize.jpg

Once Carr left, things suddenly weren’t as bad.   The losing seasons went away starting the first year.  And they didn’t bring in Lamar Jackson, it was just an okay Matt Schuab

but yeah, logically we are the Carr Texans at this point.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, RJK said:

Nah. Analytics are horseshit. Of course his completion % is high. 3/4 of his passes are behind or at the LOS 

His completion % wasn’t even high.  Think OP misstated a stat.  Bryce was 30th this week in completion %.  The bottom is where he has been every year in the NFL in that department.  

you gotta dig real deep in analytics to make a Bryce argument 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For this reason, BY will not play against the Packers. They will find a reason for him to stay on the bench again. 
    • Well he quickly deflected the question about Rico's "almost 7 YPC." He is very polished and he transitioned well to non-answers and side steps. I can see why a guy like him was able to pull the wool over on guys like Tepper.
    • 31st rushing D and 8 carries by Rico is coaching.  Rico is easily the best offensive weapon right now and it’s not really close.  *literally everyone knows Dalton is washed, horrible and shouldn’t even be a backup QB.   Drive 1? ZERO carries.  Coaching.  Drive 2 - Rico was playing great.   Did Canales lean into that or go for “balance”? Coaching. Drive 3 - ZERO carries.  Coaching  Drive 4 - 1 carry and opted for Jimmy Horn gadget rush (you can’t stick  with the Horn repetitive gadget runs each week and that’s not a better idea than getting Rico going)  Drive 5 - basically Dalton heavy as the half expired.  I don’t need to watch a game to know it’s coaching.  The gameplan wasn’t about setting Rico up to go off on a trash rush D.  It was bullshit harmony balance of the rush and the pass and making Hubbard feel good.
×
×
  • Create New...