Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Grades vs Dolphins


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, BritishPanther said:

Rozeboom surprised me with how well he played (let's face it, it wasn't hard to show a slight improvement on the crapfest he's been serving up recently), but I wouldn't agree with an 83. 

Eh, PFF..it is what it is.

I feel like somehow Evero schemed things up for him, he doesn't have the natural instincts to play ILB at that level on a weekly basis. If we had Shaq/Luke/TD he would only see special teams unless an injury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

PFF has it's uses for certain position groups but it shouldn't be seen as gospel. Sometimes you just have to look at what you're seeing with your own two eyes.

Yes. I trust my eyes. But I can’t spend time rewinding and watching 11 guys on every play, lord. But you can tell who is getting beat who is winning plays, and get good feel for what the players are doing. 
I don’t gamble, I don’t set lineups, so perusing their scores is an okay way to spend a few minutes. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Holy crap that is a lot of throws outside the right hash by Bryce... Haven't paid attention to other passing charts, but I have to imagine if the same happened in those games, then opposing DCs are going to start prioritizing coverage to the right of the center.

Yeah. Pretty obvious there. One thing I saw less of than normal (my perception) is the behind the LOS attempts. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Holy crap that is a lot of throws outside the right hash by Bryce... Haven't paid attention to other passing charts, but I have to imagine if the same happened in those games, then opposing DCs are going to start prioritizing coverage to the right of the center.

TMac was on the right side the entire game outside of one play.

The other passing charts do not look like that. This was last week's:
Bryce Young Week 4 Pass Chart

For anybody else interested in passing/rushing/receiving charts: https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/charts/player/bryce-young/YOU124763

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/6/2025 at 11:29 AM, Mistuh Jones said:

um... make it make sense. 200+ yards, no fumbles so why only a 75?! 

Listen at 6:15 if you want to know why Dowdle only received a 75 (which is good, by the way). Short answer: because the line has been balling out run blocking. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...