Eight of Bryce Young's nine wins have come off game-winning drives

[mrcompletely11]

12 hours ago, PadresPanthersFan said:

90% of the huddle can tell the coaches and gm the obvious 

Lewis told dc to run to the left as well.  Just like the huddle

[CRA]

1 hour ago, Icege said:

GWDs vs...

• HOU: 15 - 13, no turnovers
• ATL: 9 - 7, no turnovers
• NO: 23 - 22, 1 interception
• NYG: 20 - 17, no turnovers
• ARI: 36 - 30, no turnovers
• @ATL: 44 - 38, no turnovers
• MIA: 27 - 24, 1 interception + 1 fumble
• DAL: 30 - 27, 1 interception (that was clearly TMac's fault)

Which one of those games was Bryce clearly the reason that the team was behind aside from Miami?

the reason? or a reason? 

he is a reason, a lot of the time.  He is a role player.  And as a role player, we largely get a very low ceiling of offensive production from the QB  spot and passing game most weeks.  That's been a pretty consistent aspect as of the Bryce Young era. 

If the offense has zero TDs on the day and a football game is won off of 3 FGs (9 points).....I'd say Bryce Young has a LOT to do with being in that scenario lol 

and the entire point, is countering the implication that Young is somehow more clutch or better than Cam or Jake in pressure moments.  Which is absurd.  Bryce just lives in losing scenarios late. Every single week.  Which wasn't Cam or Jake.   Where essentially any game the Panthers find a way to win will log as a GWD because Bryce Young teams are always down in the 4th (factually speaking).....even if Bryce is a spectator largely in the win. 

 

 

 

 

[45catfan]

20 hours ago, TN05 said:

2023

• 15-13 over Houston
• 9-7 over Atlanta

2024

• 23-22 over New Orleans
• 20-17 over NYG
• 36-30 over Arizona
• 44-38 over Atlanta

2025

• 27-24 over Miami
• 30-27 over Dallas

He already has almost halfway as many GWDs as Cam (17) and Delhomme (22).

Yes, and only one comfortable win.  So we either lose or barely squeak out a victory 99% of the time.  Brilliant!

 

Edited 1 hour ago by 45catfan

[CRA]

1 hour ago, electro's horse said:

are we really calling the giants game last year a game winning drive like come on

I mean, if the AZ game where Hubbard ran for literally all the yards on the winning drive counts....why not the Giants game? 

[electro's horse]

39 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, if the AZ game where Hubbard ran for literally all the yards on the winning drive counts....why not the Giants game? 

I think icege is just doing it to be irritating at this point. 

Like maybe if the qb can manage more than 160 yards passing you dont need overtime to beat the 2024 New York giants.

[WUnderhill]

I remember how beloved the cardiac cats were when they leaned on the run game and seemed like every win was on the final drive and we were all holding our breath. Too bad that’s not good enough for some of you. I’d take it.