Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 7: Panthers @ Jets Gameday Thread

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Pat Jones out time for the rookie Princely or Scourton to show up. 

Hopefully these rookies start getting better QB pressure. I would like to see them develop into long term answers. Or, worst cases, very productive and long term rotational guys. I'd kill for one of them to be Al Wallace or Mario Addison.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pantherxtreme Mentor

Pantherxtreme

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Fields is so scared and uncertain of throwing the ball he actually has zero INT's this season. However he does have three fumbles. Bryce has 8 total TO's so far this season. 

On paper that TO battle doesn't favor us at QB specifically.

On the flipside with him being hesitant to let it go, he gets sacked a ton, which is why the Jets have given up the most sacks on the season with 25. 

With our pass rush being invisible so far this may be the game they can show some life. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

On the flipside with him being hesitant to let it go, he gets sacked a ton, which is why the Jets have given up the most sacks on the season with 25. 

With our pass rush being invisible so far this may be the game they can show some life. 

We also have to rely on our guys setting the edge and LB's spying Fields adequately. That's a big, BIG concern.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dep Mentor

dep

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am not gonna say INEXCUSABLE loss but....it would be as close to possible as their is for inexcusable. I hesitate to use that word because we are such a bad team.

If a Jets loss isn't inexcusable what is 

Edited by dep
typo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I expect Coker to be targeted often on 3rd down

This is my concern

Run the damned ball with Rico until they stop it

i dont care that Chuba.  Corbett or Coker are back

the primary right now should be leave the damned dance with the same line and running back combo that brung ya

Do not over think this   Do what works until it doesn’t   

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Super Grateful Collaborator

Super Grateful

Posted
Posted

the last time the Carolina Panthers were above .500 — even briefly — was in Week 3 of the 2018 season, when they started 2-1.

Here’s a quick breakdown:

  • 2018: Started 6-2 before collapsing to finish 7-9.

  • 2019–2024: They have never been above .500 at any point in those seasons — every year they’ve either started 0-1 or 1-1, then dropped below .500 and stayed there.

So the last time they were above .500 at any point was November 4, 2018, after beating Tampa Bay to go 6-2.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...