Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 7: Panthers @ Jets Gameday Thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

I don't think winning when looking like poo and making the same mistakes we always make is taking baby steps, it's just spinning your tires while stuck in the mud.

Growing pains by definition involve actually growing, something we can't seem to do under Canales, week after week of the same problems, that's not growth, it's a problem.

While I see your point, I'd like to push back on this a little. This is a franchise that has essentially forgotten how to win. Every win is a good thing for these guys. They could have easily said, "here we go again" in the 4th quarter, but they didn't. Sure, some coach decisions had me scratching my head, but they got the win, and that's never bad. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, VintagePanther said:

So since we not growing why do we have a winning record rn . Explain that please ?

Because we've played 3 of the worst teams in the entire league the past 3 weeks.

The Jets and Dolphins literally might be the 31st and 32nd best teams in the league, while the Cowboys have literally the worst defense in the NFL.

And we just eked by with wins in each of those games, if you actually think that's showing growth, then I don't know what to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tukafan21 said:

Because we've played 3 of the worst teams in the entire league the past 3 weeks.

The Jets and Dolphins literally might be the 31st and 32nd best teams in the league, while the Cowboys have literally the worst defense in the NFL.

And we just eked by with wins in each of those games, if you actually think that's showing growth, then I don't know what to say.

The dolphins are hot garbage but the Jets are much better than that record shows. They have gone toe to toe with the Buccaneers, Steelers and Broncos who all lead their divisions. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tukafan21 said:

Because we've played 3 of the worst teams in the entire league the past 3 weeks.

The Jets and Dolphins literally might be the 31st and 32nd best teams in the league, while the Cowboys have literally the worst defense in the NFL.

And we just eked by with wins in each of those games, if you actually think that's showing growth, then I don't know what to say.

Lol that’s not a valid reason . We were the laughing stock of the league the past few years now we better than other teams sound like growth to me . But it’s always them not us huh ? How convenient 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RockyTopVol said:

While I see your point, I'd like to push back on this a little. This is a franchise that has essentially forgotten how to win. Every win is a good thing for these guys. They could have easily said, "here we go again" in the 4th quarter, but they didn't. Sure, some coach decisions had me scratching my head, but they got the win, and that's never bad. 

I get it, but honestly, responses like this just frustrate me and showcase why we're such a bad franchise (and fan base).

We can't be celebrating bad wins just because they're wins, that's not going to actually improve the franchise's outlook.

Show actual on field improvement in a loss and I'm going to celebrate that 100 out of 100 times over showing regression on the field in wins against the worst teams in the league.

And that's not me asking for losses, show improvement in a win and it's even better.  Just saying that I'd rather lose in a game we show improvement than win games where we actually regress as a team, and I don't understand why that's controversial to say.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Because we've played 3 of the worst teams in the entire league the past 3 weeks.

The Jets and Dolphins literally might be the 31st and 32nd best teams in the league, while the Cowboys have literally the worst defense in the NFL.

And we just eked by with wins in each of those games, if you actually think that's showing growth, then I don't know what to say.

We also beat one of the best (statistically) teams in the league 30-0. Why didn't you mention that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, VintagePanther said:

Lol that’s not a valid reason . We were the laughing stock of the league the past few years now we better than other teams sound like growth to me . But it’s always them not us huh ? How convenient 

So you want to celebrate just not being the worst team in the league?

That to you is a good thing and worth celebrating?

For fug's sake, this is why this franchise has one of the worst fan bases ever, we just want to not be the worst team and that's good enough for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I get it, but honestly, responses like this just frustrate me and showcase why we're such a bad franchise (and fan base).

We can't be celebrating bad wins just because they're wins, that's not going to actually improve the franchise's outlook.

Show actual on field improvement in a loss and I'm going to celebrate that 100 out of 100 times over showing regression on the field in wins against the worst teams in the league.

And that's not me asking for losses, show improvement in a win and it's even better.  Just saying that I'd rather lose in a game we show improvement than win games where we actually regress as a team, and I don't understand why that's controversial to say.

Talking about on field improvement your man needs work on press man coverage 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aussie Tank said:

Talking about on field improvement your man needs work on press man coverage 

So the player the entire fan base agrees was a home run draft pick, has something to work on during his rookie season, and because of that you're going to dismiss anything I say about the actual lack of improvement by the coaching staff and QB play?

That's just dumb, very very dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair this game went just about exactly the way I thought it would.

We basically just played our doppelgänger.

Bryce looked ineffective and flaccid.  And we shot ourselves in the foot trying to shove Chubba back into the fold.  Dowdle was still the more effective back. Coaching is to blame.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

The dolphins are hot garbage but the Jets are much better than that record shows. They have gone toe to toe with the Buccaneers, Steelers and Broncos who all lead their divisions. 

If the Jets had a QB they'd be pretty good (at least mid tier).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...