Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 7: Panthers @ Jets Gameday Thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

I don't think winning when looking like poo and making the same mistakes we always make is taking baby steps, it's just spinning your tires while stuck in the mud.

Growing pains by definition involve actually growing, something we can't seem to do under Canales, week after week of the same problems, that's not growth, it's a problem.

While I see your point, I'd like to push back on this a little. This is a franchise that has essentially forgotten how to win. Every win is a good thing for these guys. They could have easily said, "here we go again" in the 4th quarter, but they didn't. Sure, some coach decisions had me scratching my head, but they got the win, and that's never bad. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, VintagePanther said:

So since we not growing why do we have a winning record rn . Explain that please ?

Because we've played 3 of the worst teams in the entire league the past 3 weeks.

The Jets and Dolphins literally might be the 31st and 32nd best teams in the league, while the Cowboys have literally the worst defense in the NFL.

And we just eked by with wins in each of those games, if you actually think that's showing growth, then I don't know what to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tukafan21 said:

Because we've played 3 of the worst teams in the entire league the past 3 weeks.

The Jets and Dolphins literally might be the 31st and 32nd best teams in the league, while the Cowboys have literally the worst defense in the NFL.

And we just eked by with wins in each of those games, if you actually think that's showing growth, then I don't know what to say.

The dolphins are hot garbage but the Jets are much better than that record shows. They have gone toe to toe with the Buccaneers, Steelers and Broncos who all lead their divisions. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tukafan21 said:

Because we've played 3 of the worst teams in the entire league the past 3 weeks.

The Jets and Dolphins literally might be the 31st and 32nd best teams in the league, while the Cowboys have literally the worst defense in the NFL.

And we just eked by with wins in each of those games, if you actually think that's showing growth, then I don't know what to say.

Lol that’s not a valid reason . We were the laughing stock of the league the past few years now we better than other teams sound like growth to me . But it’s always them not us huh ? How convenient 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RockyTopVol said:

While I see your point, I'd like to push back on this a little. This is a franchise that has essentially forgotten how to win. Every win is a good thing for these guys. They could have easily said, "here we go again" in the 4th quarter, but they didn't. Sure, some coach decisions had me scratching my head, but they got the win, and that's never bad. 

I get it, but honestly, responses like this just frustrate me and showcase why we're such a bad franchise (and fan base).

We can't be celebrating bad wins just because they're wins, that's not going to actually improve the franchise's outlook.

Show actual on field improvement in a loss and I'm going to celebrate that 100 out of 100 times over showing regression on the field in wins against the worst teams in the league.

And that's not me asking for losses, show improvement in a win and it's even better.  Just saying that I'd rather lose in a game we show improvement than win games where we actually regress as a team, and I don't understand why that's controversial to say.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Because we've played 3 of the worst teams in the entire league the past 3 weeks.

The Jets and Dolphins literally might be the 31st and 32nd best teams in the league, while the Cowboys have literally the worst defense in the NFL.

And we just eked by with wins in each of those games, if you actually think that's showing growth, then I don't know what to say.

We also beat one of the best (statistically) teams in the league 30-0. Why didn't you mention that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, VintagePanther said:

Lol that’s not a valid reason . We were the laughing stock of the league the past few years now we better than other teams sound like growth to me . But it’s always them not us huh ? How convenient 

So you want to celebrate just not being the worst team in the league?

That to you is a good thing and worth celebrating?

For fug's sake, this is why this franchise has one of the worst fan bases ever, we just want to not be the worst team and that's good enough for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I get it, but honestly, responses like this just frustrate me and showcase why we're such a bad franchise (and fan base).

We can't be celebrating bad wins just because they're wins, that's not going to actually improve the franchise's outlook.

Show actual on field improvement in a loss and I'm going to celebrate that 100 out of 100 times over showing regression on the field in wins against the worst teams in the league.

And that's not me asking for losses, show improvement in a win and it's even better.  Just saying that I'd rather lose in a game we show improvement than win games where we actually regress as a team, and I don't understand why that's controversial to say.

Talking about on field improvement your man needs work on press man coverage 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aussie Tank said:

Talking about on field improvement your man needs work on press man coverage 

So the player the entire fan base agrees was a home run draft pick, has something to work on during his rookie season, and because of that you're going to dismiss anything I say about the actual lack of improvement by the coaching staff and QB play?

That's just dumb, very very dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair this game went just about exactly the way I thought it would.

We basically just played our doppelgänger.

Bryce looked ineffective and flaccid.  And we shot ourselves in the foot trying to shove Chubba back into the fold.  Dowdle was still the more effective back. Coaching is to blame.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

The dolphins are hot garbage but the Jets are much better than that record shows. They have gone toe to toe with the Buccaneers, Steelers and Broncos who all lead their divisions. 

If the Jets had a QB they'd be pretty good (at least mid tier).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...