Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Know We Should Celebrate the Win. But Canales Is Pissing Me The fug Off


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

Bryce is interchangeable with the majority of the QBs in the middle of the league, you just hate him so much there nothing in will say that will change your mind. You mean the same Baker that had a much better panthers roster and still got cut? Or Darnold who inherited the most talented panthers team in the last decade and was benched.
 

Do you even watch football? Penix never gets under center, in terms of taking snaps under center there a bunch of other QBs that never get under center and that includes Jayden Daniel’s who is everyone darling.

I see you didn't accept my challenge. Let's just limit this discussion to the NFC.

Given me a team in NFC East (Dallas, Washington. Philadelphia, or NY) that would take Bryce over their current starter.

How about the NFC North (Green Bay, Minnesota, Detroit, or Chicago)

How about the NFC West (LA, SF, Seattle, Arizona)

In the NFC South he'd never beat out Mayfield or Pennix.

Outside of New Orleans, what team in the NFC has a current starting QB that Bryce would beat out in a fair competition?

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now Bryce is playing better than Daniels, Caleb, Wentz, Kyler, Purdy, Penix and Hurts. Keep in mind all those guys with the exception of Daniels and Purdy who weapons are all injured have much better supporting cast. 
 

They also play in schemes that don’t make them do stuff they are not comfortable with.


I know you don’t watch the rest of the league play but do you really think guys like Kyler, Daniels, Penix and Hurts who never take snap under center, who play in no huddle rpo based schemes would do better in Canales scheme? With the lack of weapons the Panther have compared to those teams. Cause I don’t 

 

Matter of fact i think if you put Bryce in scheme like the Falcons, Dolphins or Denver where it a lot quick based reads his numbers would would be much better than all those QBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Right now Bryce is playing better than Daniels, Caleb, Wentz, Kyler, Purdy, Penix and Hurts. Keep in mind all those guys with the exception of Daniels and Purdy who weapons are all injured have much better supporting cast. 
 

They also play in schemes that don’t make them do stuff they are not comfortable with.


I know you don’t watch the rest of the league play but do you really think guys like Kyler, Daniels, Penix and Hurts who never take snap under center, who play in no huddle rpo based schemes would do better in Canales scheme? With the lack of weapons the Panther have compared to those teams. Cause I don’t 

 

Matter of fact i think if you put Bryce in scheme like the Falcons, Dolphins or Denver where it a lot quick based reads his numbers would would be much better than all those QBs

You and I will have to agree to disagree on this topic.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Chuba is a good guy and well-liked in the locker room, I think that plays a big role in it.  It’s hard to take that guy’s job and give it to someone else, no matter the margin.  That being said, I’ve always felt Chuba has had his limitations, but he was a lone bright spot on the offense for a lot of years recently, so we rewarded him for it - both with playing time and a contract.  And I appreciate Chuba, but in now seeing him and Rico side by side, Chuba needs to only come in to provide Rico a breather.  Sure, Chuba may be having trouble getting back in the groove coming back from his injury, but he’s never really been a runner with a lot of suddenness.  But I feel like bigger than strengths or weaknesses, this feels like a case of “if you have 2 RBs, you have no RBs.”  Which is weird, bc historically it can work, but these guys don’t seem to complement each other very well.

I told somebody that today, the old QB adage. If you have two you don't have one. People forget when we had Double Trouble, there still was a clear edge of carry volume going to D-Lo until his departure. NFL is cut throat and if it takes us eventually bailing on Chuba to feature Rico, that decision may have to be made. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

DC could have easily just said he didn’t want to “rush” Chuba back and given way more carries to Rico

I had this exact conversation with my father earlier in the week. Canales had the easiest way out by just saying 'he'll be on a pitch count', and just see how things unfold.

Instead we got this lopsided mess where Rico clearly has the hot hand for the year so far.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this decision caused that game to be much closer than it should have. 

They essentially split carries and Roco had double the production, I think had those Chuba plays gone to Rico we would have had a much better run game and flow on offense.

Thankfully the defense stepped up and saved a game the head coach and offense was trying to blow. 

Edited by Pantherxtreme
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Right now Bryce is playing better than Daniels, Caleb, Wentz, Kyler, Purdy, Penix and Hurts. Keep in mind all those guys with the exception of Daniels and Purdy who weapons are all injured have much better supporting cast. 
 

They also play in schemes that don’t make them do stuff they are not comfortable with.


I know you don’t watch the rest of the league play but do you really think guys like Kyler, Daniels, Penix and Hurts who never take snap under center, who play in no huddle rpo based schemes would do better in Canales scheme? With the lack of weapons the Panther have compared to those teams. Cause I don’t 

 

Matter of fact i think if you put Bryce in scheme like the Falcons, Dolphins or Denver where it a lot quick based reads his numbers would would be much better than all those QBs

Godalmighty.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Right now Bryce is playing better than Daniels, Caleb, Wentz, Kyler, Purdy, Penix and Hurts. Keep in mind all those guys with the exception of Daniels and Purdy who weapons are all injured have much better supporting cast. 
 

They also play in schemes that don’t make them do stuff they are not comfortable with.


I know you don’t watch the rest of the league play but do you really think guys like Kyler, Daniels, Penix and Hurts who never take snap under center, who play in no huddle rpo based schemes would do better in Canales scheme? With the lack of weapons the Panther have compared to those teams. Cause I don’t 

 

Matter of fact i think if you put Bryce in scheme like the Falcons, Dolphins or Denver where it a lot quick based reads his numbers would would be much better than all those QBs

Hurts? What the actual fug? 😆 

 

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SCO96 said:

I see you didn't accept my challenge. Let's just limit this discussion to the NFC.

Given me a team in NFC East (Dallas, Washington. Philadelphia, or NY) that would take Bryce over their current starter.

How about the NFC North (Green Bay, Minnesota, Detroit, or Chicago)

How about the NFC West (LA, SF, Seattle, Arizona)

In the NFC South he'd never beat out Mayfield or Pennix.

Outside of New Orleans, what team in the NFC has a current starting QB that Bryce would beat out in a fair competition?

 

Possibly Minnesota, some weeks Falcons. That’s probably it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

Possibly Minnesota, some weeks Falcons. That’s probably it

Its hard to make the playoffs when your QB is significantly less talented in terms of physical attributes than the other QBs in their division (NFC South). Its practically impossible when your QB is physically less talented than every starting QB than nearly every QB in the entire NFC. 

A shorter QB can succeed if he has the arm strength, accuracy, and head knowledge to execute the game plan. Bryce is severely lacking in the first two beyond the 10 yard range and that's what is hurting the team on offense. If he could improve those two attributes I think he could excel in the NFL and our team would be a playoff contender. But, at this stage in his career I don't think things are likely to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...