Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have the 3rd leading rusher in NFL


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Pantherxtreme said:

Save the dramatics for the soap operas this is professional sports.

When Mile Sanders was the penciled starter I wanted Chuba who was outperforming him to get the bulk of the carries, now the script has been flipped.

On any other team who's sole purpose is to win Rico would have already earned the starting role. But on the teams that flounder more times than not it's front office and business decisions trump what's happening on the field. 

You might not agree with it, but this is the reality. If Chuba doesn't out play Rico this weekend, I suspect that Rico will be starting the following week.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shotgun said:

That's great if you don't care about winning.  If you do, you start the best players every time. If you don't want to lose your job because of injury, don't get injured.

The Panthers won and did the right thing for Chuba.  I suspect this weekend or next, could be a different story.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team is much more effective offensively when we run the ball. We should be calling run plays at minimum 30 times a game. Chuba hasn't had more than 17 carries in a game all year season. Dowdle is the more effective back at this time and needs to get around 20 carries a game. Chuba should get the rest. Both guys are capable catching the ball out of the backfield so either is capable of playing on 3rd down. 

At the end of the season you may have a problem though. Rico is a year older than Chuba. Would it be wise to try to bring Rico back with a new deal at 28 with Chuba already under contract for the next several years? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, jtm said:

Chuba is a key leader on this team and he needs to give Chuba an opportunity to keep the starting job and this is the right way to handle this.  We can all see that Rico is a better back at the moment and he's going to win the starting job, but he needs to win if fair and square with both backs battling it out and not when a guy is injured.  Two backs going 110% to be the starter is a good thing.  

I do feel the competition between Rico and Chuba is a very good thing. You could tell they were both giving their all yesterday. 
 

What a good problem to have! 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't mind how they were split. The only issue I had was not having Rico in the last drive to close it out. They're going to have to ride the hot hand because there will be games when Chuba is better but that wasn't the case yesterday 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real problem rotating Rico and Chuba is that they're more or less the same player, or at least the same type, they're both bruising physical runners, neither are the quick twitch elusive type.

RB tandems work best/well when you have two stylistically different players, so when you rotate them, it provides a change in what the defense has to worry about.

We have two Montgomery's but no Gibbs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuba was a bright spot on the team during some dark times but we can’t reward him for that when another RB on the roster is giving us a better chance of winning. We need to ride Rico until he cools down. Chuba is one to make the most of limited carries and he can still contribute in a big way in a lesser role. 
 

Stop overthinking this Canales. 55/45 favoring Chuba isn’t going to work. 70/30 favoring Rico gives us an identity we so desperately needed for years 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, falconlynx said:

I do feel the competition between Rico and Chuba is a very good thing. You could tell they were both giving their all yesterday. 
 

What a good problem to have! 

Both guys had over 1,000 yards rushing last season on their respective teams. I think Dowdle has clearly been the more dominant back in 2025, but it's not like Chuba is a scrubb. He's rushed over 2,000 yards combined in the past 2 seasons. 

I'm one who believes both guys can be alternated throughout the game to create one of the most dominant rushing attacks in the NFL. Imagine how effective they'd be if our best 2 run-blocking guards weren't injured. 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

The real problem rotating Rico and Chuba is that they're more or less the same player, or at least the same type, they're both bruising physical runners, neither are the quick twitch elusive type.

RB tandems work best/well when you have two stylistically different players, so when you rotate them, it provides a change in what the defense has to worry about.

We have two Montgomery's but no Gibbs.

Very good point. Even with our double trouble, DeAngelo was our smaller shiftier back who could break it loose and J-Stew was our power, early down back who could tire our a defense. Both Dowdle and Chuba need touches to really get into a rhythm, which won't happen if Canales rotates them every other series. It just isn't going to work the way it is designed right now. There needs to be a clear starter and the split needs to be 70-30 or 80-20.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Rico has more burst, id like to start seeing this from Hubbard.

6wxQDoG.gif

Rico (5'll/215) also has a more violent running style which enables him to run thru contact despite only outweighing Chuba (6'/210) by 5 lbs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

The real problem rotating Rico and Chuba is that they're more or less the same player, or at least the same type, they're both bruising physical runners, neither are the quick twitch elusive type.

RB tandems work best/well when you have two stylistically different players, so when you rotate them, it provides a change in what the defense has to worry about.

We have two Montgomery's but no Gibbs.

Well Chuba is interesting because he's kind of just a jack of all trades.  He's not really a power back.  He's not really a speed back.  He's not really a receiving back.  He sort of does it all at an acceptable level.

Rico is a true power back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Has anybody actually said anything of that sort? (if they did, I missed it) I get why some folks rely on stats. I don't, and honestly I'm not sure why people keep trying to convince me I should. (it ain't gonna happen) 😕 Consistency is my big thing too, and the lack of it is why I want to move on from Bryce. But again, that's an argument I make without denying that he can indeed play in (and yes, win) NFL games. Hating bad QB play is fine. Denying when you see good QB play is silly. Let's be real for a second... This may not be you specifically, but there are some folks for whom Bryce can do absolutely nothing to win their approval. Some are always gonna want a bigger / stronger / faster / more athletic (in some cases, Newtonesque) quarterback even if Bryce does start to play consistently. At that point, they'll just shift the argument from "we can't win with Bryce" to "well, we can't keep winning with Bryce" 😖 You know all this as well as I do. So again, I want to move on from Bryce as well. I'd happily (hell, merrily) keep him as a backup, but I doubt there's a realistic path to that happening. But no matter what, I'm gonna keep my debate points based in reality, and I'm not gonna be responsive to "he just sucks" level persuasion. Is any of that unreasonable? 🤔
    • Apples and oranges.   No one is coming for Jon Snow and the neutral party when they compliment Bruce when it is just normal talk about a game.  Which is the literal picture you are trying to paint above.  I mean that’s exactly what you argued. if you start a thread that is about the future of the franchise at QB going forward at QB and what we should do or are thinking! Yeah, the anti Bryce crowd is going to very vocal on that thread because the literal topic is extending Bryce and the future at QB (which is what an anti Bryce position is literally about.  Moving on.  The future) This thread? I literally called out people in their feelings wanting to make this about Bryce and their hurt feelings eroding over.  You can find where I literally calls them out go make another Bryce thread if they didn’t want to talk Saints and the most relevant thing about them.  And the thread went exactly as we all knew it would.   Bryce deserved player of the week talk for Atlanta.  I have always acknowledged his great games.  A shame there are only two 
    • Then the offense will be the same up and down underperforming offense they are this year and our FO are filled with idiots.
×
×
  • Create New...