Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bryce Young ankle injury is “just a one-week injury”


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

jesus christ, what weird subforum did I stumble upon where people are talking like Dalton is this incredible back up that is going to throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's like we haven't seen him in this role before, and that there is this master plan to fake Bryce's high ankle sprain in order to bench him during a winning season with favorable stats?

People said it about XL so why not Bryce.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

You had me until the literal last 2 words of this post

favorable stats?

Bryce is literally in LAST place in passing yards amongst the QBs who have started every week this season.

But sure, I guess you could consider that "favorable"

What about TD to INT ratio? I don’t care about yards he’s not my fantasy QB and Rico been getting us to the red zone lmao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God could you imagine the reaction if Canales used this ankle tweak as an opportunity to switch to Dalton and not look back. 
 

“No it’s okay Bryce, just sit this one out, your health is most important, bud”

”Man, you know Andy just looked great with those 200 yards and 2 TDs, we just need to put ourselves in the best situation possible.”

Would be funniest thing ever.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

jesus christ, what weird subforum did I stumble upon where people are talking like Dalton is this incredible back up that is going to throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's like we haven't seen him in this role before, and that there is this master plan to fake Bryce's high ankle sprain in order to bench him during a winning season with favorable stats?

The person that said 500 yards was trolling. Some of the responses were not serious. 
If he ends up with 300 or something we are probably getting our butts whipped and it’s garbage time.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

What about TD to INT ratio? I don’t care about yards he’s not my fantasy QB and Rico been getting us to the red zone lmao.

His INT% is about career average(1.9, 2.3, 2.2). It's his TD% that is at a career best(2.1, 3.9, 4.9).

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

What about TD to INT ratio? I don’t care about yards he’s not my fantasy QB and Rico been getting us to the red zone lmao.

It has nothing to do with Fantasy, he's 10th in pass attempts but something like 27th in yards with the only players below him being QB's who haven't started 7 game this year.

There is just flat out no rational way to say that is a good thing and he's playing well, those two stats are a terrible look when put together.

His TD to INT ratio is "good" because he barely throws anything other than little dink and dunk passes.  I'd be very curious to know what his TD to INT ratio is on passes that were more than 10 yards downfield, I'd bet it isn't near as good.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

He has almost as many fumbles already this season as he had all of last season.  At this point it looks like he is regressing with ball security.

I just think defenders know he's fumble prone at this point so there even more emphasis on trying to strip him. It's not like trying to tackle a Cam or Allen or even a Maye or Herbert. You're not really worried about Bryce breaking a tackle and taking off so you're less concerned about securing the tackle allowing you to focus more on trying to get the ball out.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...