Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we need to pass around the hat?!?!?


Basbear
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Anyone willing to spend mid-six figures on this site is a certified moron.

My point was that the dude wasnt going to sell regardless.  The dude I know made a small fortune in tech and spends money on poo he likes without a lot of worry about the pay back.  I dont know what BigKat put out there but my point was I dont think it would have mattered unless it hit 8 figures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sup said:

Like a bunch of y'all I went to reddit today and yes it's not great. But is the problem them ... or us?

I'm not saying we're right about everything or even most things but people just blindly homering an organization with seven (soon to be eight) consecutive losing seasons sure as hell ain't gonna be right about much.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HaricotVert said:

My point was that the dude wasnt going to sell regardless.  The dude I know made a small fortune in tech and spends money on poo he likes without a lot of worry about the pay back.  I dont know what BigKat put out there but my point was I dont think it would have mattered unless it hit 8 figures.

I think he either wasn't serious or Zod just didn't think he was serious. Which yeah, it would be hard to take anyone seriously if they were talking about spending mid-six figures on this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think he either wasn't serious or Zod just didn't think he was serious. Which yeah, it would be hard to take anyone seriously if they were talking about spending mid-six figures on this site.

The board is worth about $15k at most, maybe $10k… and he probably wouldn’t let it go for much less than $30k.

Anyone claiming they’re putting anything substantial down for a dying platform of Xennials and random old people that figured out the internet is either insane, lying, or both.

BigKat has never been serious. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

The board is worth about $15k at most, maybe $10k… and he probably wouldn’t let it go for much less than $30k.

Anyone claiming they’re putting anything substantial down for a dying platform of Xennials and random old people that figured out the internet is either insane, lying, or both.

BigKat has never been serious. 

Hey, I might be old dammit, but don't call me random!

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

The board is worth about $15k at most, maybe $10k… and he probably wouldn’t let it go for much less than $30k.

Anyone claiming they’re putting anything substantial down for a dying platform of Xennials and random old people that figured out the internet is either insane, lying, or both.

BigKat has never been serious. 

Yeah, the forum is honestly a dying platform in general. Most have been gobbled up (and basically killed) by Vertical Scope. The rest have been hurt bad by the rise of social media and reddit becoming the "catch all" with subreddits for everything under the sun. It is what it is.

I still like the Huddle and I think it has enough users to keep conversation going and fresh but not so many that it feels like chaos.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reddit is fine. Been there for years. The issue with Reddit is more along the lines of maintaining decorum, good online manners, and being generally a nice person, even in the face of absolute stupidity from other posters. Don't let the trolls and idiots get under your skin, and don't overreact from down votes. As far as quality of discussions, it is very mixed, and overall, it is easier to be a Bryce Young fan there right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...