Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can’t get over this

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ProcessBlue2 Grand Master

ProcessBlue2

Posted
Posted (edited)

Canales seemed pissed off in his press conference today. He referenced the leadership council multiple times. I feel like there was some type candid feedback and exchange from both sides and they pushed Canales to make changes he didn’t want to make or the FO didn’t want him to make.

Edited by ProcessBlue2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseCutStewart Grand Master

PleaseCutStewart

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, NAS said:

Rico was the starting back in only two games and still is top 5 in rushing yards. He only had double digit carries in 4 games. 
 

image.thumb.png.6f4b23da5cbbb0cd8a11c0550dc00a27.png

Canales is an idiot

 

Rumor is Canales is giving him less and less carries each game because every time Rico runs the ball, he is making DC look more and more like an idiot...

I feel like DC is the equivalent of a Falcons fan playing Madden and subbing out all of the Panther's starters for training camp fodder to make us go 0-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, NAS said:

Well said. I just don’t understand how Canales thinks he will gain the respect of your players if you don’t play the best players based on their level of play and contribution.  Everyone is so damn coddled it’s no wonder they fold when punched in the mouth 

Mr Rogers without the sweater

He does things even a high school coach wouldn't do

frankly, he is a bad version of Pete carroll

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Canales seemed pissed off in his press conference today. He referenced the leadership council multiple times. I feel like there was some type candid feedback and exchange from both sides and they pushed Canales to make changes he didn’t want to make or the FO didn’t want him to make.

I've heard this mentioned recently. What in the actual fưck is the "leadership council". Like man we've had coaches in the past in Rivera and Fox who we have eviscerated for their decisions but never once did I hear either of them mention a leadership council when they shīt the bed on something. The Tepper's have truly done a remarkable job sustaining joke status for this franchise it's unbelievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, frankw said:

I've heard this mentioned recently. What in the actual fưck is the "leadership council". Like man we've had coaches in the past in Rivera and Fox who we have eviscerated for their decisions but never once did I hear either of them mention a leadership council when they shīt the bed on something. The Tepper's have truly done a remarkable job sustaining joke status for this franchise it's unbelievable.

Leadership council sounds very cuckish.   Just be the man dave and make the fuging decision.  You are the head coach after all

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

Okay, tinfoil hat time, but this seems as good a place as any.

 

Don't you think it's possible Canales was saving Rico's carries for winnable games? You're starting Andy Dalton against the Bills. Is that really the game you want risk injuring your star running back by giving him 20+ carries?

Yeah, I'd feed Chuba too, and keep Rico healthy for Green Bay when you're starting QB is back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Captroop said:

Okay, tinfoil hat time, but this seems as good a place as any.

 

Don't you think it's possible Canales was saving Rico's carries for winnable games? You're starting Andy Dalton against the Bills. Is that really the game you want risk injuring your star running back by giving him 20+ carries?

Yeah, I'd feed Chuba too, and keep Rico healthy for Green Bay when you're starting QB is back.

I don’t think that is why it was done. 
I think it was faith in Chuba the first game. Also, some of those holes Rico got were massive and many backs could have taken advantage. You see that and think Chuba can run through those holes. 
Doesn’t work quite that way against the Jets. 
 

Chuba is a team Captain. So you give him another chance. I think it is that simple. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NorthTryon Mentor

NorthTryon

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, NAS said:

Well said. I just don’t understand how Canales thinks he will gain the respect of your players if you don’t play the best players based on their level of play and contribution.  Everyone is so damn coddled it’s no wonder they fold when punched in the mouth 

That is my thought. If you are a young guy or emerge with some really good plays in rotation, what is your morale when you see a guy like Rico do transcendent stuff and get relegated to rotational carries. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Leadership council sounds very cuckish.   Just be the man dave and make the fuging decision.  You are the head coach after all

Sounds college. But I guess it is just a title because there is always a defacto leadership group in the locker room 

And the coaches lean on them.  

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • XClown1986
      Post-Draft: Gantt sets A stage, not THE stage. Perhaps Reset Your Expectations

      By XClown1986 · Posted

      I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...