Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, after Sunday's game does that mean we're stuck with Bryce for the foreseeable future?


Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, pantherclaw said:

He has had 2 games of over 300 yards this season.  

Do any of you know if any other IT'S have even done the same?

We're winning.  Were winning because of Byrce.   

Many of you still need to accept that fact. 

Ah yes the GB game that we won and Bryce was going into the 4 quarter under 100 yards total. Yeah; Bryce totally won us that game.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherclaw said:

He has had 2 games of over 300 yards this season.  

Do any of you know if any other IT'S have even done the same?

We're winning.  Were winning because of Byrce.   

Many of you still need to accept that fact. 

We won Sunday and he was a very large contributor. Threw the ball where the receivers could do something with it most of the time.

 
But at the same time a lot of these games could have gotten what he contributed from a generic journeyman. We have some games left for him to stay stepped up in class, we will see if he can. 
 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

He has had 2 games of over 300 yards this season.  

Do any of you know if any other IT'S have even done the same?

We're winning.  Were winning because of Byrce.   

Many of you still need to accept that fact. 

I disagree on winning because of Bryce. This last game, you bet, he earned it, but before that, Rico should get credit for more wins than Bryce. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

He has had 2 games of over 300 yards this season.  

Do any of you know if any other IT'S have even done the same?

We're winning.  Were winning because of Byrce.   

Many of you still need to accept that fact. 

I mean, that's wild stuff.  Winning because of Bryce?    

Atlanta - We won because of defense.   

Miami - We won because of Rico

Dallas - We won because of Rico 

Jets - We won because of defense.   

Packers - We won because of defense. 

2nd Atlanta game? Sure, Bryce was a big part of that one game.  

*then the flip side, there are zero losses where you can be like, well Bryce played great and good enough to win but (insert whoever) screwed it up. 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, that's wild stuff.  Winning because of Bryce?    

Atlanta - We won because of defense.   

Miami - We won because of Rico

Dallas - We won because of Rico 

Jets - We won because of defense.   

Packers - We won because of defense. 

2nd Atlanta game? Sure, Bryce was a big part of that one game.  

*then the flip side, there are zero losses where you can be like, well Bryce played good enough to win but (insert whoever) screwed it up. 

 

 

 

 

Sad part is, even if he plays at a higher level for the rest of the season, we still don't know what he'll look like at the beginning of the next one. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

Sad part is, even if he plays at a higher level for the rest of the season, we still don't know what he'll look like at the beginning of the next one. 

Hence the reason we have to upgrade the room regardless.   His poo play to start the season has been going on for 3 seasons now.  Thats a trend and the team has to prepare for it

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Hence the reason we have to upgrade the room regardless.   His poo play to start the season has been going on for 3 seasons now.  Thats a trend and the team has to prepare for it

not just poo play to start the season.  Bryce has been poo almost this entire season.  I mean, if Bryce doesn't comeback out of the lockerroom on Sunday.....I think the Panthers were going to bench him.  I just don't see how they could of trotted him back out there.  Because it would been another disaster on top of a bunch of recent bad play.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It took Bryce 2 1/2 , almost 3 years to do what Cam did his first  fugging game.  Yet , he's the second coming of Tom Brady now.  Will he be decent,  probably,  will he be dominant stud, doubtful.  

Can you win a SB, with him??? If the answer is no, then you have to keep looking,  that is ghe ultimate goal is it not?????

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jackson113.2 said:

It took Bryce 2 1/2 , almost 3 years to do what Cam did his first  fugging game.  Yet , he's the second coming of Tom Brady now.  Will he be decent,  probably,  will he be dominant stud, doubtful.  

Can you win a SB, with him??? If the answer is no, then you have to keep looking,  that is ghe ultimate goal is it not?????

Better question. 

Can you consistently make the playoffs while paying him 45m a year for the next 5 years? 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khaki Lackey said:

Sad part is, even if he plays at a higher level for the rest of the season, we still don't know what he'll look like at the beginning of the next one. 

That depends. Last year, he was fools gold mostly. He had looked so horrible that even below average play was a big step up and made him look better than he was.  

He never had a game like Sunday. That was so far above his average… if he can keep that up or close, I think maybe it would be safer to trust that he has had the switch come on.  
He has a horrible trend of following his best performance with complete poo so if he can stay out of that pattern and give us something good on top of Sunday and to finish the year I would feel a lot better. I am talking high bar, not just not totally sucking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...