Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales


scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

They said on the broadcast last night what I have been saying. Canales is limited to what he can do because of Bryce. Last week in Atlanta he seemed genuinely so happy that he got to use most of the playbook and Bryce set a record. But from week to week we never know which Bryce is going to show up. The Atlanta Bryce was obviously a fluke. If he could play Atlanta every week he'd be good. 

can't do a QB sneak
can't do any designed QB runs that go up the middle/danger zone
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noteably posted a thread following the Saints game defending Canales for his play calling.  Again, I still do not think he called a bad game against New Orleans.  That said, As bad as bryce was, Canales was equally awful.  In the saints game, they legit sold out and stopped the run and because of that he was forced to pass and it was bryce not excecuting that caused the problems.

Yesterday however, play design was as poor as the actual play itself.  SF did not sell out to stop the run, we were hitting 6 ypc, but we just said no.  When we did pass it was throws to the flat, no down field, none of what was successful last week.  If we did throw past 5 yards it went to one single guy.  It was all around putrid.

I will defend his first down at the one playcall however, this was way early and he hadnt had yet to see the run game succeed really like he did later, the biggest problem was that was one of the worst reads I've ever seen a QB make.  There were 5 guys on the reciever...everyone was covered, throw the fuging ball away.

However, from there, instead of seeing that his QB had turned back into a pumpkin, he doubled down in an "effort" to get him in a "rhythm"...although without uptempo, without movement, just safe throws to the flat.  Clearly he lost faith in bryce after that, but instead of focusing on the thing thats successful, he abandoned the run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

I noteably posted a thread following the Saints game defending Canales for his play calling.  Again, I still do not think he called a bad game against New Orleans.  That said, As bad as bryce was, Canales was equally awful.  In the saints game, they legit sold out and stopped the run and because of that he was forced to pass and it was bryce not excecuting that caused the problems.

Yesterday however, play design was as poor as the actual play itself.  SF did not sell out to stop the run, we were hitting 6 ypc, but we just said no.  When we did pass it was throws to the flat, no down field, none of what was successful last week.  If we did throw past 5 yards it went to one single guy.  It was all around putrid.

I will defend his first down at the one playcall however, this was way early and he hadnt had yet to see the run game succeed really like he did later, the biggest problem was that was one of the worst reads I've ever seen a QB make.  There were 5 guys on the reciever...everyone was covered, throw the fuging ball away.

However, from there, instead of seeing that his QB had turned back into a pumpkin, he doubled down in an "effort" to get him in a "rhythm"...although without uptempo, without movement, just safe throws to the flat.  Clearly he lost faith in bryce after that, but instead of focusing on the thing thats successful, he abandoned the run game.

if we used the MIA, Dallas, and GB games gameplan last night against the 49ers, we blow them out with the 3 INTs

But instead we get Canales out smarting himself

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

if we used the MIA, Dallas, and GB games gameplan last night against the 49ers, we blow them out with the 3 INTs

But instead we get Canales out smarting himself

Miami and Dallas have the worst defenses in the league.

Packers game plan managed 16 points and won on a fluke.

they’re not a good offense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Miami and Dallas have the worst defenses in the league.

Packers game plan managed 16 points and won on a fluke.

they’re not a good offense. 

So do the 49ers though you look at their defensive metrics they were near the bottom in about everything that mattered. 

I'm sure we helped their stats now however with our (offensive) performance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

So do the 49ers though you look at their defensive metrics they were near the bottom in about everything that mattered. 

I'm sure we helped their stats now however with our (offensive) performance. 

Dallas is historically bad on defense.

Miami is trash.

they had two good games from a rb on a one year deal and everyone overreacted and thought we’d signed Gayle Sayers.

i don’t doubt saleh would have figured out a way to stop a hypothetical run heavy offense either. Bryce can’t hit poo 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Dallas is historically bad on defense.

Miami is trash.

they had two good games from a rb on a one year deal and everyone overreacted and thought we’d signed Gayle Sayers.

i don’t doubt saleh would have figured out a way to stop a hypothetical run heavy offense either. Bryce can’t hit poo 

Green Bay actually has a good defense much better than the 49ers.

This game should of been reflective of Dallas and Miami with both offenses moving the ball and the first defense that gets a stop wins at the end.

Nothing about 49ers defensive numbers show they were capable of shutting down anything other than an incompatible offense that clearly the Panthers have. 

Edited by Pantherxtreme
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Dallas is historically bad on defense.

Miami is trash.

they had two good games from a rb on a one year deal and everyone overreacted and thought we’d signed Gayle Sayers.

i don’t doubt saleh would have figured out a way to stop a hypothetical run heavy offense either. Bryce can’t hit poo 

You are probably right but you have to make him prove it. You change only if he proves it.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, scratched said:

His seat has to be hot! In the 2 most pivotal games this year, NO at home and SF on Monday night football, he finds a way to look even worse than BY! He needs to give up play calling duties, and hope it changes the trajectory, if he truly wants to keep his job. 9 carries by our RBs and 2 pass attempts to TEs against a team who is extremely weak at LB position is unacceptable. His use of TOs was terrible and his decision on when to go for it and when not to was terrible! I think we need him gone and bring in someone who picks the QB they want to run the offense. This just isn't working. 

You have pretty high standards for a fan of a franchise that hasn't had a winning record in nearly a decade.

Dude is winning with a team in full rebuild mode with a traffic cone at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...