Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Young nominated again...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, jasonluckydog said:

Bryce Young

Anthony Richardson 

CJ Stroud

Will Levis

CJ is in the lead but BY is catching him if you compare stats. Right now I believe we picked the best QB in that class. 

Stroud has a Pro Bowl but BY could make a case if he gets consistent. 

 

 

Fixed it for ya!😀

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TN05 said:

3 TDs and no turnovers + outdueling the MVP favorite is how

First of all, just because we won the game, doesn't mean he "out dueled" the MVP.  Played better?  Sure, I'll give you that since Stafford had the TO's, but our running game and defense won this game, Bryce didn't "out duel" Stafford.  Our running game and defense made it a game, Bryce made 2 TD throws, but I wouldn't say 2 passes equates to "out dueling" in any way.

This is supposed to be (at least the way I've always viewed it) as a vote for who had the best statistical performances for the week.

So why does 206 yards and 3 TDs beat out say, Mahomes' 261 and 4 TDs?  How does AJ Brown's 10 rec, 132 yds, 2 TDs get left off the list?  I think Jameson (7, 144, 1), Rice (8, 92, 2) and Wicks (6, 94, 2) also might be clear omissions I'd put in there over Bryce too.

I'm not bashing Bryce's performance, I just struggle to see how 206 yards gets a nomination for the "air and ground player of the week".  

If this was just "MVP of the week" then I'd say there is a stronger argument, and maybe it's on me for just how I interpret what this award is supposed to mean.  

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jasonluckydog said:

Bryce Young

Anthony Richardson 

CJ Stroud

Will Levis

CJ is in the lead but BY is catching him if you compare stats. Right now I believe we picked the best QB in that class. 

Stroud has a Pro Bowl but BY could make a case if he stays consistent. 

There is discussion...

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...