Why does Bryce get the blame?

[GoobyPls]

5 hours ago, PantherChris said:

im well aware of that you do know the motion required to generate a throw like that is extremely painfull on the opposite shoulder too right?  Also it was the longest pass he threw all night at 27 air yards.... hardly a "bomb"

They inject players with so much o doubt Baker felt anything, again if your gonna use Baker hurting his shoulder 4 weeks ago vs his poor performance vs NO then I’m gonna use Bryce still wrapped ankle for any future misgivings. 

[strato]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Turk signing never made any sense. Turk was basically a five tech pass rush specialist in KC benefitting from playing beside one of the best all around DTs in the league. He didn't fit our scheme at all. It was baffling. 

Just another example of a dumb ole Huddler seeing something obvious that our decision makers were evidently blind to.

 

 

I smell Tillis’ influence here, in the Wharton signing.  KC. Probably vouched for his locker room vibe and motor.  

Edited 1 hour ago by strato

[LinvilleGorge]

37 minutes ago, strato said:

I smell Tillis’ influence here, in the Wharton signing.  KC. Probably vouched for his locker room vibe and motor.  

No idea. I just know that my initial reaction was "What??? That makes no sense for our scheme."

[ForJimmy]

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No idea. I just know that my initial reaction was "What??? That makes no sense for our scheme."

He is definitely overpaid and has been a disappointment.  Has had trouble staying healthy honesty, but I'm not sure our scheme is an issue.  We run nickel more than anything like most teams.  We line with with 4 DL sometimes and 3 sometimes.  If he gets healthy and starts playing like he did in KC we will roll with a front that is best for him more times than not IMO.  

[LinvilleGorge]

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He is definitely overpaid and has been a disappointment.  Has had trouble staying healthy honesty, but I'm not sure our scheme is an issue.  We run nickel more than anything like most teams.  We line with with 4 DL sometimes and 3 sometimes.  If he gets healthy and starts playing like he did in KC we will roll with a front that is best for him more times than not IMO.  

Classic example of a guy who cashed in on being a one year wonder in a contract year. He had three career starts in his first four seasons then had 6.5 sacks in his fifth year with 10 starts and we give him $40M. 

He's a fine rotational guy but he's not a guy you pay like a legit building piece.

[ForJimmy]

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Classic example of a guy who cashed in on being a one year wonder in a contract year. He had three career starts in his first four seasons then had 6.5 sacks in his fifth year with 10 starts and we give him $40M. 

He's a fine rotational guy but he's not a guy you pay like a legit building piece.

Yeah no doubt we overpaid on him and Moehrig.  I'm just saying scheme isn't really the issue.  

[ForJimmy]

Looks like we have an out in Wharton's contract after next year.  Cap Hit is $19 million dead cap is $4.8.

[frankw]

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I suspect there'll be a significant gap between what we need and what we'll get.

Better backup? Yeah, probably.

Any form of competition for Bryce outside of a team ping pong tournament? Wouldn't bet on it. 

If that is ultimately the course of action the decision makers go with they will be doing so at their own peril. I'll just sit back and wait for it to end the same way it has the last 3 years.

[mrcompletely11]

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

If that is ultimately the course of action the decision makers go with they will be doing so at their own peril. I'll just sit back and wait for it to end the same way it has the last 3 years.

Yep