Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

shough vs tmac off rookie of the year


fanpanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Shough was 22/27 for 333 yards (12.3 ypa) with 2 tds, a 142.7 rating, and a 81.9 QBR.

Still not enough to get OROTY but he's now got 2125 yards on the season, pretty impressive.

Moves to 5-3 as a starter.  Good odds to finish 6-3.   With his starting numbers he might have an outside shot if both WRs lay an egg in the finale.  Still a long shot but I bet Vegas makes a noticeable change 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shough is now 5-3 in his starts

69.6 comp %, 249 pass yards per game, QB ratings of 97.2 in his 8 starts.   

If he closes out the season w/ a win and plays well?  It will be tough not to give it to him in all honesty if he finishes 6-3 on a 5 game win streak. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

Shough is now 5-3 in his starts

69.6 comp %, 249 pass yards per game, QB ratings of 97.2 in his 8 starts.   

If he closes out the season w/ a win and plays well?  It will be tough not to give it to him in all honesty if he finishes 6-3 on a 5 game win streak. 

He’s shown more development/ability in 8 games than Young has in 3 years. 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, trueblue said:

I really wish we could see what TMac could do if he:

1. Had an NFL level QB throwing to him

2. Actually brought both hands with him each time he runs a route.. 

 

 

 

This obsession with the one handed catch is absurd. Not saying he isn't capable but you have to try and get two hands on the ball in more of the scenarios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...