Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 18: Panthers @ Buccaneers Gameday Thread


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Butterflyj30 said:

All of the Commentators are saying how the Refs robbed us

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/DTEYsGqgYxV/?img_index=2&igsh=dnR3dGl1YWN2cjBo

Very glad everyone could see it. Refs + whatever that Rico fumble was are what decided the game. Been a fan long enough to know thay Saints will win tomorrow. Then comes the off-season and figuring out if I can keep watching a poo product (The NFL as a whole).

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Lol ok man... Keep slurping Bryce's dick while blaming Evero and the D for giving up 16 to a fully healthy Tampa O

Who the fug do you think you are talking to like that?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

I don’t think he’s a Bryce Stan 

Nobody on planet earth hates Bryce more than me, this dude is just a complete fuging retard telling a pissed off mod that has had too much to drink to suck a dick.

Here we are going to show everyone a lesson on the fug around and find out matrix. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keys to the game

  • The Panthers could not get going on the ground, rushing for just 19 yards on 14 carries. Conversely, the Bucs lived off the run, amassing 138 rushing yards on 41 totes and helping them dominate the time-of-possession battle at 37:25 to 22:35.
  • Carolina's offense continued their struggles on third down, picking up the sticks just once on eight such looks. Between the last two weeks combined, the Panthers converted on two of their 19 third-down looks.

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2026/01/03/panthers-buccaneers-game-recap-18/88010473007/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Scott Van Pelt: “Bryce young answered some questions”

 

like what? He does this all year. He will be horrendous and then have a decent game. He isn’t good folks. 

I’ve never seen the media cover for such a shitty player.  Ever.  The way they treated Cam is a testament to the biased reporting.  Why are they fluffing this obviously inept pipsqueek of a turd of a #1 pick?  Normally they would step over themselves to declare the pick a bust but not Bryce!  They keep baby dicking him.  I truly don’t get it!  fug this QB all the way back to Cali. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...