Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING NEWS: Per Jeremy Fowler, Panthers expected to pickup Bryce Young's 5 year option


Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Pick it up and his trade value goes up, especially if he makes a run into the playoffs.

There's enough mystery there as to has the coaching been holding him back or has it been his physical portion.

There's going to be a coach or GM out there that's going to look at Baker Mayfield and Sam Darnold, look at the Panthers organization, and think Bryce might be worth a flyer if there's a two year inexpensive tryout period. 

Maybe the Vikings, Dolphins or even Pittsburgh. Might even be a hail Mary attempt from Phoenix.

And maybe we do it and stick with him after a really strong showing in the playoffs, if we get there. 

The biggest problem is that Bryce has had some pretty good performances, just enough to make a front office wonder, but we've also had some really dud coaching games, too. So is Bryce the problem or is it our coaching and game planning. 

Hell, we don't even know, so other teams probably are looking at it and seeing that while the odds aren't good, there's a heck of a payoff if they are right.

 

I wish I thought the team was full of sharks, that would operate this way.

 

Man as far as blaming coaching… you can hire a great chef but if all he has is dog food for his ingredients, you are gonna get dog food. 
Do you blame the chef? 
 

When you give that chef some nicely marbled top grade beef, and it still tastes like dog food, then you blame the chef. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For better or worse the FO is picking up the option. I think there are some people here who overestimate Dan Morgan and particularly ignore how invested he is in Bryce Young succeeding. He has expressed this multiple times.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

thats the point, they arent drafting a guy if they pick up the 5th

It’s unlikely but I wouldn’t say not possible. The most likely move is we do what the titans did in 2018 with Mariotta and Tannehill but I’d prefer we didn’t and go with a 2nd year guy into 2027

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We have ample options. All of free agency, some trade options and the entire draft. Make that two full cycles of that if we DON'T pick up the 5th year. 

If you are planning on moving on or even hedging your bet, that isn't a situation you pick up a 5th year option. The 5th year option is basically a cheap(usually) precursor to signing a guy that is gonna get a big contract. Well that is for sure not Bryce Young.

His UFA value would probably be in the neighborhood of $3-10 mil on a one year deal.

I'd seriously call the Ravens and see if the rumor is true

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

It’s unlikely but I wouldn’t say not possible. The most likely move is we do what the titans did in 2018 with Mariotta and Tannehill but I’d prefer we didn’t and go with a 2nd year guy into 2027

So instead of drafting a player to compete next season at another position we draft a player to start in the fifth year of Bryce contract we just picked up.

finger on the pulse here 

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

 

Back to School outfit lol 

10 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

It will also prove who's really running this show. 

 

 

maxresdefault.jpg

I plan on doing an AI image of each Tepper-era coach and asking the Huddle what do they remember from each one 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m enjoying watching some of the other players progress but not sure I can stomach watching next season if I know Bryce is going to be apart of the team for 2 more years. This is insanity. The O-line is good enough to support a new rookie QB right now. Cut your losses and try ANYONE else. He’s so fuging limited.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

Dumb teams make dumb decisions. That being said, this is just speculation, nothing concrete yet. 

It is just speculation. That said, it is crucial to recognize how these things get done and how business is conducted in the league. Picking up the 5th year is not so much an outlier contract year. Once that is done, it's not really realistic to think they are going to sign Young to an extension that would be in the ballpark of that 5th year. That is why if a team and player are not a good long-term fit, they tend part ways before that 5th year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...